Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Saara Lilja (email), Timo Kuuluvainen

Structure of old Pinus sylvestris dominated forest stands along a geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia

Lilja S., Kuuluvainen T. (2005). Structure of old Pinus sylvestris dominated forest stands along a geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 3 article id 377. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.377

Abstract

Stand structural characteristics were examined in old Pinus sylvestris dominated sites in three regions along a broad geographic and human impact gradient in mid-boreal Fennoscandia. The study regions were: 1) Häme in south-western Finland, with a long history of forest utilization, 2) Kuhmo in north-eastern Finland, with a more recent history of intensive forest utilization, and 3) Vienansalo in Russian Karelia, still characterized by a large near-natural forest landscape. Within each region the sampled sites were divided into three human impact classes: 1) near-natural stands, 2) stands selectively logged in the past, and 3) managed stands treated with thinnings. The near-natural and selectively logged stands in Häme and Kuhmo had a significantly higher Picea proportion compared to stands in Vienansalo. In comparison, the proportions of deciduous tree volumes were higher in near-natural stands in Vienansalo compared to near-natural stands in Häme. The pooled tree diameter distributions, both in near-natural and selectively logged stands, were descending whereas managed stands had a bimodal diameter distribution. Structural diversity characteristics such as broken trunks were most common in near-natural stands and in stands selectively logged in the past. The results demonstrate the higher structural complexity of near-natural stands and stands selectively logged in the past compared to managed stands, and highlight that old near-natural stands and stands selectively logged in the past vary widely in their structures. This obviously reflects both their natural variability but also various combinations of pre-industrial land use and human impact on fire disturbance. These factors need to be acknowledged when using “natural” forest structures as a reference in developing strategies for forest management, restoration and nature conservation.

Keywords
disturbances; restoration; stand structure; managed forest; old growth forest

Author Info
  • Lilja, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail saara.lilja@helsinki.fi (email)
  • Kuuluvainen, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail tk@nn.fi

Received 8 April 2004 Accepted 23 May 2005 Published 31 December 2005

Views 2381

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.377 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Gorshkov V. V., Bakkal I. J. (1996) Species richness and structure variations of Sco.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5599
Kuuluvainen T., Leinonen K. et al. (1996) Statistical opportunities for comparing stand st.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5598
Vettenranta J., (1996) Effect of species composition on economic return.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 1 article id 5574
Oskarsson O., Tigerstedt P. M. A. (1972) The possibilities in forest tree breeding II. Se.. Silva Fennica vol. 6 no. 3 article id 4869
Kuusela K., (1956) On the structure and growth of birch stands trea.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 90 article id 4652
Nyyssönen A., (1950) Comparative study on structure and development o.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 68 article id 4600
Heikurainen L., Seppälä K. (1973) Regional variation and continuity of stand growt.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 132 article id 7566
Goude M., Nilsson U. et al. (2022) Comparing basal area growth models for Norway sp.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10707
Siipilehto J., Lindeman H. et al. (2016) Reliability of the predicted stand structure for.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 3 article id 1568
Fahlvik N., Ekö P. M. et al. (2015) Effects of precommercial thinning strategies on .. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 3 article id 1302
Moilanen M., Hytönen J. et al. (2015) Fertilization increased growth of Scots pine and.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 3 article id 1301
Kreutz A., Aakala T. et al. (2015) Spatial tree community structure in three stands.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 2 article id 1279
Rossi S., Morin H. et al. (2013) Spatially explicit structure of natural stands d.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 3 article id 973
Brumelis G., Strazds M. et al. (2009) Stand structure and spatial pattern of regenerat.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 5 article id 172
Siitonen J., Hottola J. et al. (2009) Differences in stand characteristics between bro.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 1 article id 216
Kojola S., Penttilä T. et al. (2004) Impacts of different thinning regimes on the yie.. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 4 article id 407
Karjalainen L., Kuuluvainen T. (2002) Amount and diversity of coarse woody debris with.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 555
Rouvinen S., Kuuluvainen T. et al. (2002) Tree mortality in a Pinus sylvestris dominated b.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 554