Table 4. Validation accuracy assessment of the biophysical forest attributes (BFA) estimates. | |||||||||||||||||||||
S | BFA | NEW approach | REUSE approach | FORECAST approach | |||||||||||||||||
MPD |
RMSE | RMSE% | λ0 | λ1 | σε |
MPD | RMSE | RMSE% | λ0 | λ1 | σε |
MPD | RMSE | RMSE% | λ0 | λ1 | σε |
||||
S1 | Ho | 0.5ns | 0.9 | 5 | –1.1 | 1.03 | 0.8 | 0.4ns | 0.8 | 4 | 4.6 | 0.73 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 8 | 4.4a | 0.68b | 0.4 | ||
HL | 0.9 | 1.0 | 6 | 1.6 | 0.84 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 4 | 1.0 | 0.90 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 12 | 2.8 | 0.71 | 0.5 | |||
N | –439.3 | 471.4 | 38 | 431.8 | 1.01 | 179.2 | –769.3 | 793.6 | 63 | 851.3a | 0.93 | 203.6 | –865.6 | 913.6 | 73 | 389.5 | 1.38 | 281.8 | |||
G | –2.0 | 2.9 | 11 | 5.0 | 0.88 | 2.2 | –1.4ns | 3.9 | 15 | 1.7 | 0.99 | 3.9 | –6.2 | 6.9 | 27 | 7.7 | 0.94 | 3.1 | |||
V | –10.8ns | 26.4 | 14 | 1.3 | 1.05 | 25.2 | 15.6ns | 36.1 | 19 | 17.3 | 0.83 | 33.3 | –38.3 | 49.0 | 25 | 42.8 | 0.98 | 32.0 | |||
AGB | –6.7ns | 14.7 | 12 | 6.3 | 1.00 | 13.7 | 17.4 | 23.7 | 19 | –1.6 | 0.87 | 16.5 | –17.5 | 21.7 | 17 | 20.0 | 0.98 | 13.4 | |||
S2 | Ho | 0.3ns | 0.8 | 4 | 3.1a | 0.81b | 0.5 | –0.1ns | 1.0 | 5 | 4.7a | 0.75b | 0.6 | –0.1ns | 1.4 | 8 | 7.6a | 0.58b | 0.6 | ||
HL | –0.2ns | 0.7 | 4 | 2.2 | 0.87 | 0.6 | –0.4 | 0.7 | 4 | 2.3a | 0.88 | 0.5 | –0.1ns | 0.6 | 4 | 3.0a | 0.82b | 0.4 | |||
N | 7.2ns | 116.6 | 18 | 121.8 | 0.80b | 101.8 | 76.1ns | 164.4 | 26 | 150.1a | 0.64b | 99.4 | 50.2ns | 171.9 | 27 | 254.1a | 0.52b | 74.8 | |||
G | –1.4ns | 3.9 | 17 | 4.3 | 0.87 | 3.6 | 1.4ns | 3.6 | 16 | 5.8a | 0.69b | 1.7 | –2.4 | 4.2 | 19 | 8.5a | 0.73b | 2.6 | |||
V | –19.9 | 32.6 | 18 | 38.1a | 0.90 | 25.1 | 25.9 | 40.5 | 23 | 29.7a | 0.69b | 14.8 | –20.4 | 33.3 | 19 | 53.2a | 0.82b | 21.4 | |||
AGB | –12.8 | 23.2 | 21 | 22.5 | 0.91 | 19.4 | 25.5 | 33.4 | 31 | 12.6a | 0.65b | 9.0 | –16.2 | 22.9 | 21 | 21.6 | 0.95 | 16.5 | |||
S3 | Ho | 0.1ns | 0.8 | 4 | 3.3a | 0.85b | 0.7 | –1.7 | 1.9 | 8 | 7.6a | 0.74b | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 5 | 2.7a | 0.84b | 0.6 | ||
HL | 0.7 | 0.9 | 5 | 2.3a | 0.86b | 0.5 | 0.0ns | 0.8 | 4 | 4.5a | 0.78b | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 6 | –0.1 | 0.96 | 0.7 | |||
N | –52.0ns | 171.1 | 22 | 158.6 | 0.86 | 163.2 | 39.1ns | 163.2 | 21 | 362.2a | 0.47b | 104.5 | –184.5 | 261.4 | 34 | 329.2a | 0.81 | 183.9 | |||
G | –1.7ns | 4.5 | 15 | 4.6 | 0.91 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 6.3 | 20 | 3.8 | 0.73 | 4.2 | –5.5 | 7.3 | 24 | 8.8 | 0.89 | 4.9 | |||
V | –13.5ns | 38.5 | 13 | 12.5 | 1.00 | 36.8 | 33.0 | 56.2 | 19 | 57.5a | 0.70b | 36.3 | –42.6 | 73.5 | 25 | 35.0 | 1.03 | 61.1 | |||
AGB | –5.0ns | 21.3 | 13 | 20.5 | 0.91 | 20.6 | 20.9 | 30.9 | 18 | 23.6 | 0.74b | 18.9 | –24.5 | 41.0 | 24 | 42.2 | 0.90 | 33.1 | |||
S = Stratum. S1 = Young forest, S2 = Mature forest with Site index ≤ 11 m, S3 = Mature forest with Site index > 11 m. Biophysical forest attributes; Ho = Dominant height (m), HL = Lorey’s mean height (m), N = Stem number (ha–1), G = Basal area (m2 ha–1), V = Volume (m3 ha–1), AGB = Aboveground biomass (Mg ha–1). MPD = Mean predictor difference. RMSE = Root mean square error. RMSE% = relative RMSE. λ0, λ1, σε |