Table 1. The rutting damage severity (%) at stand-level in following classes: 0% i.e. undamaged, <10%, 10%–20% and >20%. Damage severity describes the relative length of track that is seen as damaged in above mentioned four classes. Track is damaged if there is over 1-meter long rutting with higher depth than 10 cm in mineral soils and 20 cm in peatlands. | ||||||||
Damage severity | Correct timing | Incorrect timing | ||||||
0% | <10% | 10%–20% | >20% | 0% | <10% | 10%–20% | >20% | |
Stands, n | 25 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 5 | 5 |
% | 69.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 13.9 | 38.7 | 29.0 | 16.1 | 16.1 |
Table 2. Percentage of “not damaged” and “damaged” logging tracks in relation to Finnish legislation limits (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 1996) when the timing of the harvest either matched with or differed from the static trafficability map class. Track count (n) is shown in parenthesis. Static trafficability classes were: (1) Operations possible in any season, (2) Operations possible in summer, (3) operations possible in summer during dry season and (4) operations possible only during frost or thick layer of snow. | ||||
Static trafficability class | Correct timing | Incorrect timing | ||
Not damaged, % (n) | Damaged, % (n) | Not damaged, % (n) | Damaged, % (n) | |
1 | 94.2 (49) | 5.8 (3) | - | - |
2 | 100.0 (34) | 0.0 (0) | 94.7 (18) | 5.3 (1) |
3 | 67.7 (21) | 32.3 (10) | 87.1 (27) | 12.9 (4) |
4 | 38.5 (5) | 61.5 (8) | 78.8 (26) | 21.2 (7) |