1

Fig. 1. Locations of the paper and pulp mills from which sample-based measurements were included in the green density prediction study material (P = pine, S = spruce, B = birch, SD = decayed spruce, A = aspen).

Table 1. The number of observations by pulpwood assortments in the green density prediction study material.
Pulpwood assortment Total Year
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Pine 1) 20 299 3421 2488 4677 3699 2456 1867 1691
Spruce 2) 10 769 1120 1072 1344 1706 2015 1955 1557
Spruce, decayed 3) 2991 221 238 304 447 789 538 454
Birch 4) 17 423 2854 2455 3111 3027 2446 1852 1678
Aspen 5) 2293 281 222 215 365 522 385 303
1) Contain mainly Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris); 2), 3) mainly Norway spruce (Picea abies); 4) mainly downy birch (Betula pubescens) or/and silver birch (Betula pendula); 5) mainly aspen (Populus tremula).
Table 2. Green density (kg m–3) values and storage time of green density prediction study material by pulpwood assortments.
Pulpwood
assortment
Number of
observations
Green density, kg m–3 Storage time, days
Mean Std Median Mean Std Median
Pine 20 299 878.9 71.0 892 70 83 40
Spruce 10 769 845.7 64.3 854 38 48 21
Spruce, decayed 2991 731.6 56.4 732 43 56 26
Birch 17 423 868.3 65.9 881 70 79 40
Aspen 2293 804.4 60.2 809 50 57 29
2

Fig. 2. Sub-areas (A–E) for the regional calibration used in green density MODELS 2.

Fig. 3. Green density values of pine of the green density modeling data in 2013–2018. Red line indicates trimmed moving average.

Table 3. Parameter estimates of models for green density (kg m–3) of the pulpwood assortments (MODELS 1). The standard error of the estimates is presented in parenthesis.
Pine Spruce Spruce, decayed Birch Aspen
Variable Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate Estimate
Intercept 908.07 (3.753) 865.05 (3.431) 749.79 (6.566) 931.56 (6.644) 362.91 (113.98)
WEEK –1.224 (0.466) –4.078 (1.048)
WEEK>22 5.431 (1.176) 2.085 (0.672)
WEEK2 –0.061 (0.014) 0.339 (0.068)
WEEK2>15 0.535 (0.098)
WEEK2>20 0.194 (0.083)
WEEK2>22 1.015 (0.172)
WEEK3 –0.0052 (0.001) –0.01165 (0.002) –0.0014 (0.0006)
STORAGE –0.219 (0.043) –0.307 (0.068) –1.033 (0.080) –0.733 (0.038) –0.496 (0.092)
STORAGE>300 days 0.284 (0.020) 0.259 (0.107) 0.245 (0.053) 0.295 (0.021)
STORAGENov-March 0.264 (0.047) 0.204 (0.075) 0.686 (0.042)
STORAGEOct-Apr 1.125 (0.073)
STORAGEDec-March 0.345 (0.104)
STORAGEMay –0.333 (0.087) 0.445 (0.084)
STORAGEJune –0.716 (0.094) –1.268 (0.144) 0.395 (0.104)
STORAGEJuly –0.539 (0.109)
TS –0.157 (0.008) –0.162 (0.015) –0.034 (0.007) –0.067 (0.010)
TEMP –0.532 (0.166) –6.439 (1.189)
ln(TEMP+30) 138.19 (33.746)
TEMP3month –0.791 (0.126) –0.767 (0.290) –0.765 (0.121)
TEMPmax20 0.550 (0.102) 0.821 (0.201) 0.433 (0.083)
ln(TEMPmax20 +1) –4.081 (0.902)
RAINFALL 0.304 (0.022) 0.126 (0.031) 0.146 (0.011) 0.258 (0.036)
RAINFALL3month –0.080 (0.010)
RAINFALLwater 0.247 (0.012)
AREAE×MONTHFeb-May 13.652 (1.838)
AREAB×TS 0.020 (0.002)
AREAC×TS 0.038 (0.007)
AREAE×TS –0.018 (0.004)
var(wij) 147.34 149.06 131.51 177.03 148.98
corr(wij) 0.843 0.785 0.915 0.882 0.793
var(eijk)
MONTHJan-May × STORAGE<1month 1802.89 1725.79 2098.89 1118.45 1784.02
MONTHJan-May × STORAGE>1month 2512.92 2545.36 2067.21 1594.11 1895.57
MONTHJune-Dec × STORAGE<1month 2175.07 2318.61 2144.50 1574.23 1875.02
MONTHJune-Dec × STORAGE>1month 3357.90 3240.48 2671.54 1929.57 1980.89
WEEK, delivery date of pulpwood at the mill expressed as week number (1–52); WEEK>15, dummy variable for wood delivered after week number 15 expressed as WEEK-15 (week); WEEK>20, dummy variable for wood delivered after week number 20 expressed as WEEK-20 (week); WEEK>22, dummy variable for wood delivered after week number 22 expressed as WEEK-22 (week); STORAGE, storage time of pulpwood (day); STORAGE>300, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood exceeded >300 days (day); STORAGENov-March, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood between November and March (day); STORAGEOct-Apr, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood between October and April (day); STORAGEDec-March, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood between December and March (day); STORAGEMay, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood in May (day); STORAGEJune, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood in June (day); STORAGEJuly, dummy variable for storage time of pulpwood in July (day); TS, temperature sum with a +5 °C threshold (dd); TEMP, average temperature of the storage time (°C); TEMP3month, average temperature of the last three months or whole storage time when storage time <3 months (°C); TEMPmax20, the number of storage days when maximum temperature of the day is >20 °C; RAINFALL, precipitation during the storage time (mm); RAINFALL3month, precipitation of the last three months or whole storage time when storage time <3 months (mm); RAINFALLwater, precipitation during the storage time when average temperature of the days is >0 °C (mm); MONTHFeb-May, dummy variable for delivery time between February and May (0.1); AREAB, dummy variable for sub-area B; AREAC, dummy variable for sub-area C; AREAE, dummy variable for sub-area E; var(wij), variance of random week effect; corr(wij), autocorrelation of the successive weeks, var(eijk) error variance of pulpwood group k; MONTHJan-May, MONTHJune-Dec, error variance of group k when delivery date is January–May or June–December, STORAGE<1month and STORAGE>1month, error variance of group k when storage time is less than or more than 1 month.
Table 4. Relative root mean squared prediction errors (%) of green density calculated from the single parcels for four prediction methods: using the fixed part of the new models only (Fixed), correcting Fixed by the predicted week effect (Calibrated), using mill-specific trimmed moving averages of the last seven sample measurements (MOVING AVG), and using fixed green density factors (FGDF).
Pulpwood assortment rRMSE, %
Fixed Calibrated MOVING AVG FGDF
Pine 6.70 6.30 7.91 8.89
Spruce 6.63 6.63 7.61 7.12
Spruce, decayed 6.06 5.98 7.25 6.86
Birch 5.23 4.79 6.45 6.63
Aspen 6.11 5.74 7.06 7.98
Table 5. Relative root mean squared prediction errors (%) of green density calculated from weekly averages; using the fixed part of the new models only (Fixed), correcting Fixed by the predicted week effect (Calibrated), using mill-specific trimmed moving averages of the last seven sample measurements (MOVING AVG), and using fixed green density factors (FGDF).
Pulpwood assortment rRMSE, %
Tree species Fixed Calibrated MOVING AVG FGDF
Pine 2.20 1.34 1.39 4.54
Spruce 1.40 1.22 1.51 2.64
Spruce, decayed 2.96 2.62 3.38 3.24
Birch 2.09 0.90 1.33 2.82
Aspen 4.05 3.40 4.99 5.48
Table 6. Differences in the annual averages over the whole test data (year 2019) between the predicted and measured green densities (kg m–3) by pulpwood assortments; predictions both with fixed part of the model and after calibration, using the predicted week effects.
Pulpwood assortment N Prediction error
Mean
Fixed Nationwide
calibration
Pine 1691 –14.6 –2.7
Spruce 1557 –4.2 –1.8
Spruce, decayed 454 –3.6 –1.1
Birch 1678 –13.6 –0.8
Aspen 303 –15.7 –7.4
N, number of observations in test data (2019); Fixed, fixed predictions of the developed models; Nationwide calibration, predictions calibrated at national level.

Fig. 4. Averages of observed (Obs.) and predicted (Fixed, Calib.) green density values in the test data (2019) by month. Fixed is fixed predictions. Calib. is the predictions obtained with the nationwide calibration.

Table 7. Differences in the annual sub-area level averages over the whole test data (year 2019) between the predicted and measured green densities (kg m–3) by pulpwood assortments; predictions both with fixed part of the model and after calibration, using the predicted week effects.
Sub-area N Prediction error
Mean
Fixed Nationwide
calibration
Regional
calibration
A 193 –17.3 –7.0 –8.4
B 826 –18.3 –5.7 –4.1
C 38 –16.0 –3.8 NA*
D 506 –16.3 –4.5 –6.2
E 128 19.8 31.3 8.3
N, number of observations in test data (2019); Fixed, fixed predictions of the developed models; Nationwide calibration, predictions calibrated at national level; Regional calibration, predictions calibrated at reginal level. *Could not be estimated due to low number of observations.

Fig. 5. Monthly averages of observed (Obs.) and predicted (Fixed, Calib. Calib_area) green density values in sub-area E (North Finland) in the test data (2019). Fixed is fixed predictions. Calib. is the predictions obtained with the nationwide calibration. Calib_area is the predictions obtained with the regional calibration.