Table 1. The results of sonic tomograph measurements of wood on trunk cross-sections at six heights above the ground at the ‘Bartek’ oak tree in Poland. | ||
Height above ground level [cm] | Thickness of layer of undamaged wood min–max [cm] | Share of undamaged wood [per cent] |
25 | 4.2–36.3 | 9 |
75 | 3.5–29.9 | 7 |
125 | 2.2–19.7 | 5 |
175 | 3.3–23.0 | 5 |
225 | 2.4–33.5 | 6 |
275 | 3.2–38.2 | 11 |
Table 2. Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters (Fo,, Fm, Fv/Fm, non-photochemical fluorescence quenching parameters (qN, NPQ), gas exchange parameters (A, E, WUE), stomatal conductivity [Gs] ) and water potential [Ψ] measured on leaves from two branches of ‘Bartek’ oak tree in Poland. Averages of 5 leaves, ±SD. | ||
Branch | ||
1 | 2 | |
Chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters | ||
Fo | 145.4 ± 7.8 | 141.6 ± 7.7 |
Fm | 705.8 ± 123.5 | 579.4 ± 93.4 |
Fv/Fm | 0.79 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
qN | 0.68 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.15 |
NPQ | 2.14 ± 0.34 | 1.98 ± 0.50 |
Gas exchange parameters | ||
A [µmol CO2 m–2 s–1] | 16.9 ± 1.8 | 18.5 ± 2.1 |
E [mmol H2O m–2 s–1] | 6.1 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 0.8 |
WUE [A/E] | 2.8 | 2.5 |
Stomatal conductivity | ||
Gs [mol H2O m –2 s–1] | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.02 |
Leaf water potential | ||
Ψ [–MPa] | –1.4 ± 0.3 | –1.1 ± 0.2 |
[Fo], initial fluorescence, [Fm], maximal fluorescence, [Fv/Fm] = (Fm – Fo)/ Fm, qN = 1 − Fm × Fo/(Fm − Fo)2 × (1 − ΦD)2/ΦD, where [ΦD] quantum rate of absorbed light energy in PSII allocated to ‘Dissipation’ in the Demmig-Adams model; NPQ = (Fm − Fo)/Fo × ΦD/(1 − ΦD) – 1 ]; [A] assimilation; [E] transpiration [E]; [WUE] water use efficiency; [Ψ] leaf water potential. |