Fig. 1. Top view drawing of the MagMat tray carousel (left) and the test-rig mounted on a Bracke Planter during the field testing (right). Note that the test-rig lacks a protective barrier around the carousel. Photo and drawing: Rikard Wennberg.
Fig. 2. Loading a Hiko cultivation tray onto one of MagMat’s eight frames. Photo: Rikard Wennberg.
Fig. 3. Flowchart of the work elements involved in reloading the Bracke Planter (BP) with seedlings. Dotted- and dashed-border boxes represent work elements exclusive to the 70Car and MagMat carousels respectively, while elements common to both carousels have a solid border.
Table 1. Baseline cost factors for the base machine and Bracke Planter planting device. |
Factor | Unit a) | Value |
Mid-sized tracked excavator |
Purchase price including seedling storage box | Euro | 172 200 |
Full labour costs including operator travel costs | Euro SMh–1 | 32 |
Insurance and administration | Euro SMh–1 | 2 |
Maintenance, lubrication and fuel costs | Euro PWh–1 | 18.5 |
Scheduled time | SMh yr–1 | 1600 |
Bracke Planter planting device |
Purchase price | Euro | 55 560 |
Maintenance costs | Euro PWh–1 | 2.1 |
Scheduled time | SMh yr–1 | 1200 |
Table 2. Parameter values for the Bracke Planter and M-Planter used in the baseline and sensitivity analysis. |
Parameter | Unit a) | Baseline value | Sensitivity analysis |
Bracke Planter | M-Planter | Minimum | Maximum |
Mean planting time excluding seedling reloading | s pl–1 | 14.9 b) | 13.0 c) | –40% | +30% |
Fixed costs (including full labour costs) | Euro SMh–1 | 58.0 | 61.0 | –10% | +40% |
Variable costs | Euro PWh–1 | 20.5 | 20.8 | –10% | +40% |
Interest rate | % | 5 | 5 | 3 | 10 |
Opening/closing protective barrier on MagMat | s reload–1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 60 |
Automatic tray switching time | s tray–1 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 60 |
Mechanical availability (MA) of MagMat | % | 100 | 100 | 80 | 100 |
Fig. 4. The mean total time consumption (TC) per loaded seedling for the standard Bracke Planter seedling carousel (70Car) and MagMat tray carousel. MagMat’s TC includes an assumed 10 s per reload for opening/closing a protective barrier. Vertical bars delineate the range of means for the landing time study’s three operators.
Table 3. Average time consumption (TC) values and ranges per work element when three different operators reloaded seedlings during the time study. |
Work element abbreviation in Fig. 3 | Work element | Mean TC per reload (s) | Range of TC per reload (s) |
Common elements for both carousels |
A | Detect empty carousel and rotate planting device | 13 | 8–15 |
B + D | Travelling to and from cab – seedling storage box | 36 | 27–46 |
E | Recommence work and plant in empty mound | 15 | 14–20 |
70Car (70 seedlings per reload) |
C1 + C3 | Moving trays between storage box and carousel | 14 | 9–20 |
C2 | Seedling reloading | 105 | 94–115 |
| Total for 70Car | 183 | 170–200 |
MagMat (320 seedlings per reload) |
CM | Reloading trays including moving trays between storage box and carousel and removing empty trays | 90 a) | 83–99 a) |
FM | Automatic tray switching during machine operation | 200 | 192–264 |
| Total for MagMat | 354 a) | 303–410 a) |
Fig. 5. Total cost per planted seedling of the Bracke Planter (BP) and M-Planter (MP) as a function of the added investment cost for MagMat and its mechanical availability (MA). 70Car and 162Car are the current seedling carousels for the Bracke Planter and M-Planter respectively. Note: the y-axes have been truncated.
Fig. 6. Total cost per planted seedling of the Bracke Planter (BP) and M-Planter (MP) as a function of how quickly seedling trays can be switched automatically on the MagMat tray carousel and its added investment cost (assuming 100% MA). 70Car and 162Car are the current seedling carousels for the Bracke Planter and M-Planter respectively. Note: the y-axes have been truncated.
Fig. 7. The time consumption (TC) of various MagMat capacities as a function of how quickly seedling trays can be switched automatically for configurations with more than one tray. Mechanical availability (MA) is assumed to be 100% and that the TC for applicable work elements equal the mean values presented in Table 3.