Table 1. Physical and chemical evaluation of the soil profile of a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal. |
Horizon depth (cm) | Organic Matter (%) | P2O5 (mg kg–1) | K2O (mg kg–1) | Total N (g kg–1) | texture |
10 | 3.39 | 86 | 350 | 5.60 | Loam |
80 | 0.63 | 7 | 94 | 0.40 | Sandy Clay loam |
180 | 0.22 | 5 | 60 | 0.30 | Sandy loam |
Fig. 1. Irricork: The 1 ha experimental cork oak plot divided by fertirrigation treatments, in Avis, Portugal.
Table 2. Results of the trees’ dendrometric measurement performed in 2017 at a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal. |
Trees | CBH (cm) | TH (m) | HCB (m) | canopy projection (m2) |
Planted in 2003/05 (mean + S.D.) | Debarked | 75.11 ± 11.04 | 9.26 ± 1.06 | 6.43 ± 0.45 | 20.33 ± 8.03 |
Non-debarked | 52.05 ± 17.21 | 7.18 ± 1.76 | 4.79 ± 0.49 | 8.52 ± 5.88 |
centenary (N. 13) (mean + S.D.) | 214.16 ± 46.20 | 11.29 ± 1.10 | 7.88 ± 0.68 | 136.60 ± 56.87 |
Fig. 2. Monthly volume of total water – Precipitation and irrigation – supplied to the cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal over the study period. In 2017 and 2018 “Late fertirrigation” and “Fertirrigation ½” treatments were watered as Fertirrigation 1.
Table 3. Resume of daily fertirrigation by treatment during fertirrigation campaign at a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Treatment | Daily fertirrigation (mm) |
Mean | Maximum | Minimum | Standard Deviation |
Fertirrigation 1 | 1.29 | 2.91 | 0.01 | 0.78 |
Fertirrigation ½ | 0.55 | 1.31 | 0.01 | 0.36 |
Late Fertirrigation | 1.01 | 2.65 | 0.01 | 0.76 |
Table 4. Resume of collected data and calculated parameters at a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Variables | Collected data | Average values | Calculated parameters | Average values | Periodicity |
Dependent | Trees’ Radial increment at 130 cm height | (0.25 ± 0.21 mm) /15 days | | | 15–30 days |
Independent | Meteorological | Average Air Relative Humidity (raH) | 71.35 ± 14.77 % | air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) | 1.39 ± 0.88 Kpa |
Average Air Temperature (aT) | 15.67 ± 5.60 °C |
Average Solar Irradiance (SI) | 179.26 ± 81.84 Wm–2 | | |
Sum of Precipitation (Prec) | (23 ± 31 mm)/15 days | | |
Treatment | Sum of Irrigation | (5.2 ± 7.6 mm)/15 days | | |
Subject conditions | Trees cork’ age | Virgin: 16.40 ± 1.02 years | | | |
Secondary: 2.83 ± 1.30 years | | | annual |
Trees Circunference at Breast Height (CBH) | 0.81 ± 0.03 m | Tree Intraspecific Competition (index) | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
Georreferencing | lat, long | initial |
Table 5. Best fitting model of the curve estimation procedure for the relationship between daily stem increment (cm) at 130 height for each environmental factor, measured in a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Factors | Equation | M. Summary | Parameter estimates | Tangential ≥ 0 |
R2 | p-value | b1 | b2 | b3 | |
Av. raH (%) | Quadratic | 0.16 | <0.001 | 0.050 | –4.2E-04 | | ]-∞, 60.11%] |
Av. aT (°C) | Cubic | 0.22 | <0.001 | –0.207 | 0.020 | –4.9E-04 | [6.95–20.33] |
Av. SI (Wm–2) | Quadratic | 0.19 | <0.001 | 2.2E-04 | 5.0E-06 | | [–22.46, +∞[ |
Av. VPD (Kpa) | Quadratic | 0.20 | <0.001 | 0.004 | –0.001 | | ]-∞, 2.05] |
D. Prec (mm) | Quadratic | 0.11 | <0.001 | –0.005 | 0.001 | | [4.8, +∞[ |
Fig. 3. Pyramid frequency (number of time units) of cork oak daily stem increments under fertirrigated and non-fertirrigated trees at a 1 ha cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, during fertirrigation campaigns from 2017–2020. Solid lines represent confidence interval for the medians.
Table 6.1. Generalized linear mixed model estimates of the Independent fixed effects on the daily stem increments (cm) at 130 height measured in a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Model term | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-student | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
Intercept | –11.117 | 0.208 | –53.351 | <0.001 | –10.708 | –11.525 |
Cork age (year) | –0.052 | 0.005 | –10.608 | <0.001 | –0.042 | –0.062 |
Initial CBH (cm) | 0.018 | 0.002 | 8.12 | <0.001 | 0.022 | 0.014 |
Av. SI (Wm–2) | 0.006 | 0.001 | 11.923 | <0.001 | 0.007 | 0.005 |
D. Prec (mm) | 0.231 | 0.018 | 13.086 | <0.001 | 0.266 | 0.196 |
(Daily Prec)2 | –0.009 | 0.002 | –5.119 | <0.001 | –0.005 | –0.012 |
Av. VPD (Kpa) | 2.588 | 0.129 | 20.093 | <0.001 | 2.841 | 2.336 |
(Av. VPD)2 | –0.646 | 0.031 | –20.893 | <0.001 | –0.585 | –0.706 |
D. fertirrigation | 0.218 | 0.037 | 5.93 | <0.001 | 0.291 | 0.146 |
(D. fertirrigation)2 | 0.019 | 0.014 | 1.385 | 0.166 | 0.045 | –0.008 |
(D. fertirrigation)3 | –0.018 | 0.004 | –4.966 | <0.001 | –0.011 | –0.025 |
IC Hh3 | –0.395 | 0.163 | –2.428 | 0.015 | –0.714 | –0.076 |
Table 6.2. Generalized linear mixed model covariance estimates for residual and random effects (repetitions) with first-order autoregressive structure on the daily stem increments (cm) at 130 height measured in a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Residual effect | Coefficient | Std. Error | Z-test | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
AR1 Rho | 0.320 | 0.016 | 19.797 | <0.001 | 0.288 | 0.351 |
AR1 Diagonal | 0.740 | 0.018 | 40.272 | <0.001 | 0.705 | 0.777 |
Table 7.1. Generalized linear mixed model estimates of the Independent fixed effects on the daily stem increments (cm) at 130 height measured on non-fertirrigated trees from a cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, during the 2017–2020 Fertirrigation campaigns. |
Model term | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-student | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
Intercept | –4.237 | 0.53 | –7.988 | <0.001 | –3.196 | –5.279 |
Cork age (year) | –0.052 | 0.007 | –7.038 | <0.002 | –0.038 | –0.067 |
Initial CBH (cm) | 0.011 | 0.004 | 3.165 | 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Av. SI (Wm–2) | 0.013 | 0.001 | 8.947 | <0.002 | 0.016 | 0.01 |
Av. VPD (Kpa) | –4.142 | 0.405 | –10.216 | <0.003 | –3.346 | –4.938 |
(Av. VPD)2 | 0.682 | 0.079 | 8.641 | <0.004 | 0.837 | 0.527 |
Table 7.2. Generalized linear mixed model covariance estimates for residual and random effects (repetitions) with first-order autoregressive structure on the daily stem increments (cm) at 130 height measured on non-fertirigated trees from a cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, between 2017 and 2020. |
Residual effect | Coefficient | Std. Error | Z-test | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
AR1 Rho | 0.338 | 0.045 | 7.591 | <0.001 | 0.248 | 0.422 |
AR1 Diagonal | 0.707 | 0.042 | 16.782 | <0.001 | 0.629 | 0.794 |
Table 8.1. Generalized linear mixed model estimates of the Independent fixed effects on the daily stem increments at 130 height measured on fertirrigated trees from a cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, during the 2017–2020 fertirrigation campaigns. |
model term | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-student | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
Intercept | –8.512 | 0.95 | –8.964 | <0.001 | –10.376 | –6.648 |
Cork age (year) | –0.044 | 0.006 | –6.825 | <0.001 | –0.056 | –0.031 |
Initial CBH (cm) | 0.015 | 0.003 | 5.818 | <0.001 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Av. SI (Wm–2) | 0.007 | 0 | 15.612 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.008 |
Av. VPD (Kpa) | 0.034 | 0.807 | 0.042 | 0.966 | –1.549 | 1.618 |
(Av. VPD)2 | –0.187 | 0.177 | –1.058 | 0.291 | –0.534 | 0.16 |
D. fertirrigation (mm) | 0.662 | 0.072 | 9.246 | <0.001 | 0.522 | 0.803 |
(D. fertirrigation)2 | 0.003 | 0.015 | 0.227 | 0.821 | –0.025 | 0.032 |
(D. fertirrigation)3 | –0.034 | 0.005 | –7.388 | <0.001 | –0.042 | –0.025 |
Table 8.2. Generalized linear mixed model covariance estimates for residual and random effects (repetitions) with first-order autoregressive structure on the daily stem increments (cm) at 130 height measured on fertirrigated trees from a cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal. between 2017 and 2020. |
Residual effect | Coefficient | Std. Error | Z-test | p-value | 95% Conf. Interval |
lower | upper |
AR1 Rho | 0.166 | 0.048 | 3.481 | <0.001 | 0.071 | 0.258 |
AR1 Diagonal | 0.436 | 0.025 | 17.289 | <0.001 | 0.389 | 0.489 |
Fig. 4. Relationship between daily fertirrigation (mm) and predicted radial stem increments (cm) at a 1 ha fertirrigated cork oak plot in Avis, Portugal, calculated with the Model 3 “Fertirrigation campaign – fertirrigated trees”, separated by debarked vs non-debarked trees. Lines correspond to Kernel density using Epanechnikov function with 60% points to fit.