Table 1. Clones included in the study (origin from a clone test (Stener 2004)). | |||||
Clone ID a) | Taxon | Dbh d) (cm) | No. of stumps | Additional information | |
Co1 | (5) | P. maximowiczii b) × P. trichocarpa b) | 40.1 | 7 | USA, Commercial name ‘Androscoggin’ |
Co2 | (4) | P. maximowiczii × P. nigra b) | 36.5 | 10 | USA, Commercial name ‘Rochester’ |
Co3 | (113) | P. maximowiczii × P. trichocarpa | 46.3 | 4 | USA |
Co4 | (8) | Balsam type c) | 36.5 | 4 | Unknown origin |
Co5 | (122) | P. trichocarpa | 35 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Co6 | (108) | P. trichocarpa | 32 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Co7 | (97) | P. trichocarpa | 29.7 | 3 | Alaska, USA |
Co8 | (38) | Balsam type c) | 38.8 | 4 | Unknown origin |
Ca1 | (87) | P. trichocarpa | 36.7 | 3 | Washington, USA |
Ca2 | (37) | P. deltoides b) × P. nigra | 35.3 | 3 | Unknown origin |
Ca3 | (67) | P. trichocarpa | 30.4 | 5 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Ca4 | (103) | P. trichocarpa | 31 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Ca5 | (50) | P. trichocarpa | 29.4 | 5 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Ca6 | (111) | P. trichocarpa | 34.8 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
Ca7 | (92) | P. trichocarpa | 29 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
1 | (51) | P. trichocarpa | 26.8 | 4 | Oregon, USA |
2 | (2) | P. deltoides × P. trichocarpa | 38.3 | 4 | Wageningen, Netherlands, Commercial name ‘Barn’ |
3 | (45) | P. trichocarpa | 26.3 | 4 | Washington, USA |
4 | (104) | P. trichocarpa | 25.8 | 4 | Washington, USA |
5 | (54) | P. trichocarpa | 25.6 | 5 | Oregon, USA |
6 | (66) | P. trichocarpa | 23.8 | 5 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
7 | (96) | P. trichocarpa | 29.3 | 4 | Oregon, USA |
8 | (121) | P. trichocarpa | 19.3 | 4 | Br. Columbia, Canada |
a) Commercial clones start with clone ID ‘Co’, candidates start with ‘Ca’ and additional clones are numbered in the bottom. In parentheses Skogforsk’s ID is given. b) P. maximowiczii Henry, P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gary, P. deltoides Marsh., P. nigra L. c) Unknown clones of P. trichocarpa, P. balsamifera L. or hybrids of these two species. d) Dbh refers to the felled trees. |