Table 1. Business net classification framework (modified from Möller and Rajala 2007). | ||||||
Current Business Nets | Business Renewal Nets | Emerging Business Nets | ||||
Vertical Demand-Supply Nets High level of determination | Horizontal Market Nets | Business Renewal Nets | Customer Solution Nets | Application Nets | Dominant Design Nets | Innovation Networks Low level of determination |
Stable value system
| Established value system
| Emerging value system
|
Table 2. Summary of results. | |||
Elements | Network of company A | Network of company B | Current state of networking in wood products industry |
Structure and business idea | A hub company and balanced network partners; a shared goal | A hub company with partners concentrating on their own core competencies | Networking at low level, but some opportunities identified |
Goals of the business network | Offering substitutes to concrete elements | High quality wooden claddings with full services, economic value | Promoting internationalisation, larger offer sizes |
Network partner selection criteria | Track record in wood construction sector, networking skills | Relationships and earlier collaboration, proper financial management | Building image, track record, high quality of work |
Benefits and opportunities | Innovativeness as opportunity in a specialist network | Better scalability if new partners are found | Improved profitability, larger deals for customers |
Strategic resources | Lacking in installation and operative management of the industrial plant | Lack of salesforce and difficulties in finding good partners | Increasing role of customers requires resource integration for small companies |
Openness, trust and commitment | Open atmosphere, dialogic and trustful culture | Commitment based on contracts, more openness needed | Openness and trust as a starting point |
Challenges | Current poor economic situation, threat of imitation, resource allocation problems | Current poor economic situation, difficulties in finding partners | Current poor economic situation; suspicious attitude towards competitors |