1

Fig. 1. (I) Rasamala trees planted in Graha Waskita, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, (II) The treatments of methyl jasmonate and ethephon applied to (a) twig without incision (TW), (b) incised twig (TI), (c) incised branch (BI), (d) drilled branch (BD), (III) Rasamala balsam exuded from the incised twig.

Table 1. Effect of interaction of induction techniques; on the twigs by making incision (TI), on the branches by making holes using an electric drill (BD), and on the branches by making incision (BI) and chemical stimulants; ethephon and methyl jasmonate to Rasamala balsam exudation.
Stimulant Concentration (% (w/w)) Rasamala balsam induced (gram)
on the twigs with injury
(TI)
on the branches by making an incision
(BI)
on the branches by making holes using an electric drill
(BD)
Ethephon 0.1 0.28 ± 0.05k 1.71 ± 0.60hij 1.24 ± 0.60ijk
Ethephon 1 0.52 ± 0.08k 2.18 ± 0.74fghi 1.90 ± 0.60ghi
Ethephon 2 0.66 ± 0.05k 2.54 ± 0.45efgh 2.24 ± 0.57fgh
Ethephon 5 0.70 ± 0.06k 2.97 ± 0.88def 2.42 ± 0.60efgh
Ethephon 10 0.73 ± 0.13k 4.98 ± 0.69b 2.90 ± 0.38defg
Methyl Jasmonate 0.1 0.84 ± 0.43jk 2.45 ± 0.71efgh 1.92 ± 0.47ghi
Methyl Jasmonate 1 2.26 ± 1.30fgh 3.72 ± 0.73cd 1.90 ± 1.09ghi
Methyl Jasmonate 2 2.35 ± 0.96fgh 3.93 ± 1.37c 2.00 ± 0.74fghi
Methyl Jasmonate 5 2.51 ± 0.67efgh 5.54 ± 0.85ab 3.41 ± 0.51cde
Methyl Jasmonate 10 2.62 ± 0.40efgh 6.22 ± 0.78a 5.05 ± 0.55b
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Three-factorial ANOVA was used to compare multiple means, with different letters indicating significant variations in distances (p < 0.05).