Table 1. Effect of interaction of induction techniques; on the twigs by making incision (TI), on the branches by making holes using an electric drill (BD), and on the branches by making incision (BI) and chemical stimulants; ethephon and methyl jasmonate to Rasamala balsam exudation. | ||||
Stimulant | Concentration (% (w/w)) | Rasamala balsam induced (gram) | ||
on the twigs with injury (TI) | on the branches by making an incision (BI) | on the branches by making holes using an electric drill (BD) | ||
Ethephon | 0.1 | 0.28 ± 0.05k | 1.71 ± 0.60hij | 1.24 ± 0.60ijk |
Ethephon | 1 | 0.52 ± 0.08k | 2.18 ± 0.74fghi | 1.90 ± 0.60ghi |
Ethephon | 2 | 0.66 ± 0.05k | 2.54 ± 0.45efgh | 2.24 ± 0.57fgh |
Ethephon | 5 | 0.70 ± 0.06k | 2.97 ± 0.88def | 2.42 ± 0.60efgh |
Ethephon | 10 | 0.73 ± 0.13k | 4.98 ± 0.69b | 2.90 ± 0.38defg |
Methyl Jasmonate | 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.43jk | 2.45 ± 0.71efgh | 1.92 ± 0.47ghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 1 | 2.26 ± 1.30fgh | 3.72 ± 0.73cd | 1.90 ± 1.09ghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 2 | 2.35 ± 0.96fgh | 3.93 ± 1.37c | 2.00 ± 0.74fghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 5 | 2.51 ± 0.67efgh | 5.54 ± 0.85ab | 3.41 ± 0.51cde |
Methyl Jasmonate | 10 | 2.62 ± 0.40efgh | 6.22 ± 0.78a | 5.05 ± 0.55b |
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Three-factorial ANOVA was used to compare multiple means, with different letters indicating significant variations in distances (p < 0.05). |