Fig. 1. (I) Rasamala trees planted in Graha Waskita, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia, (II) The treatments of methyl jasmonate and ethephon applied to (a) twig without incision (TW), (b) incised twig (TI), (c) incised branch (BI), (d) drilled branch (BD), (III) Rasamala balsam exuded from the incised twig.
Table 1. Effect of interaction of induction techniques; on the twigs by making incision (TI), on the branches by making holes using an electric drill (BD), and on the branches by making incision (BI) and chemical stimulants; ethephon and methyl jasmonate to Rasamala balsam exudation. | ||||
Stimulant | Concentration (% (w/w)) | Rasamala balsam induced (gram) | ||
on the twigs with injury (TI) | on the branches by making an incision (BI) | on the branches by making holes using an electric drill (BD) | ||
Ethephon | 0.1 | 0.28 ± 0.05k | 1.71 ± 0.60hij | 1.24 ± 0.60ijk |
Ethephon | 1 | 0.52 ± 0.08k | 2.18 ± 0.74fghi | 1.90 ± 0.60ghi |
Ethephon | 2 | 0.66 ± 0.05k | 2.54 ± 0.45efgh | 2.24 ± 0.57fgh |
Ethephon | 5 | 0.70 ± 0.06k | 2.97 ± 0.88def | 2.42 ± 0.60efgh |
Ethephon | 10 | 0.73 ± 0.13k | 4.98 ± 0.69b | 2.90 ± 0.38defg |
Methyl Jasmonate | 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.43jk | 2.45 ± 0.71efgh | 1.92 ± 0.47ghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 1 | 2.26 ± 1.30fgh | 3.72 ± 0.73cd | 1.90 ± 1.09ghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 2 | 2.35 ± 0.96fgh | 3.93 ± 1.37c | 2.00 ± 0.74fghi |
Methyl Jasmonate | 5 | 2.51 ± 0.67efgh | 5.54 ± 0.85ab | 3.41 ± 0.51cde |
Methyl Jasmonate | 10 | 2.62 ± 0.40efgh | 6.22 ± 0.78a | 5.05 ± 0.55b |
Values are presented as the mean ± SD. Three-factorial ANOVA was used to compare multiple means, with different letters indicating significant variations in distances (p < 0.05). |