Fig. 1. Eight controlled burning sites in southern Finland marked with black dots. The test sites ‘Kivimäensalo’, ‘Liesjärvi’, ‘Pyhä-Häkki’, ‘Nuuksio’, and ‘Seitseminen’ were burned in 2021, whereas ‘Evo’, ‘Ruunaa’, and ‘Salamajärvi’ in 2022. All the test sites are located within national parks or protected areas.
Table 1. Coordinates of the center of each test site, forest types, and dates of controlled burnings and pre- and post-fire terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) measurements. The test sites are located in southern Finland. | |||||
Site | Coordinates (N, E) | Forest type | Pre-fire TLS | Burning | Post-fire TLS |
Kivimäensalo | 62°18.419’, 27°41.495’ | mesic heath | 10 Jun 2021 | 6 Jul 2021 | 9 Sep 2021 |
Liesjärvi | 60°39.043’, 24°1.070’ | sub-xeric heath | 16 Jun 2021 | 17 Jun 2021 | 5 Sep 2021 |
Pyhä-Häkki | 62°51.358’, 25°25.417’ | sub-xeric heath | 13 Jun 2021 | 30 Jun 2021 | 7 Sep 2021 |
Nuuksio | 60°19.484’, 24°32.349’ | sub-xeric heath | 6 Jun 2021 | 7 Jun 2021 | 30 Jun 2021 |
Seitseminen | 61°58.080’, 23°24.735’ | sub-xeric heath | 20 Jun 2021 | 1 Jul 2021 | 6 Sep 2021 |
Evo | 61°13.342’, 25°11.761’ | mesic heath | 3 Jun 2022 | 15 Aug 2022 | 18 Aug 2022 |
Ruunaa | 63°22.814’, 30°30.132’ | sub-xeric heath | 9 Jun 2022 | 30 Jun 2022 | 3 Jul 2022 |
Salamajärvi | 63°17.267’, 24°37.976’ | dry heath | 13 Jul 2022 | 16 Aug 2022 | 13 Sep 2022 |
Fig. 2. The test site ‘Evo’ two months before (left) and a few days after (right) the controlled burning.
Fig. 3. Pre-fire point clouds (left) were aligned with post-fire point clouds (right) using a 3D transformation derived from common tie points, e.g., the large black dots in the figure. The tie points were manually extracted from the point clouds.
Table 2. Stand characteristics and mean elevation of controlled burning sites. N = number of stems, G = basal area, Dg = basal area weighted mean diameter at breast height, Hg = basal area weighted mean height, Vol = stem volume, CC = canopy cover. The test sites are located in southern Finland. | |||||||||
Site | Area (ha) | N (ha–1) | G (m2 ha–1) | Dg (cm) | Hg (m) | Vol (m3 ha–1) | CC (%) | Stand age (~y) | Elevation (m) |
Kivimäensalo | 1.2 | 732 | 17.1 | 18.7 | 16.9 | 140 | 54 | 60 | 164 |
Liesjärvi | 1.0 | 527 | 12.7 | 19.2 | 16.1 | 93 | 42 | 60 | 140 |
Pyhä-Häkki | 1.0 | 1 147 | 31.4 | 21.7 | 18.3 | 261 | 79 | 70 | 176 |
Nuuksio | 1.1 | 369 | 21.2 | 31.0 | 20.6 | 205 | 55 | 150 | 100 |
Seitseminen | 1.0 | 687 | 25.3 | 24.3 | 21.6 | 260 | 55 | 50 | 184 |
Evo | 1.2 | 751 | 23.7 | 26.3 | 18.6 | 210 | 68 | 60 | 171 |
Ruunaa | 0.9 | 948 | 28.5 | 21.5 | 19.6 | 274 | 76 | 120 | 152 |
Salamajärvi | 1.0 | 919 | 30.7 | 23.0 | 19.6 | 272 | 65 | 70 | 190 |
Table 3. Recall, precision, and F1-score quantifying the performance of the classification method for identifying ‘burned’ and ‘unburned’ areas for each controlled burning site. | |||
Site | Recall | Precision | F1-score |
Kivimäensalo | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.98 |
Liesjärvi | 0.77 | 1.00 | 0.87 |
Pyhä-Häkki | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
Nuuksio | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.86 |
Seitseminen | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
Evo | 0.87 | 0.65 | 0.74 |
Ruunaa | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
Salamajärvi | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.83 |
Mean | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
Fig. 4. Three 1 × 1 m cells from the test site ‘Evo’, classified as ‘burned’ by the developed classification method but as ‘unburned’ through visual interpretation (a), and three 1 × 1 m cells from the test site ‘Kivimäensalo’ classified as burned both by the developed method and visual interpretation (b). Pre-fire (green) and post-fire (red) point clouds are overlaid. View larger in new window/tab.
Table 4. Proportions of 1 × 1 m cells classified as ‘burned’ and ‘unburned’ for each controlled burning site. | ||
Site | Proportion of 1 × 1 m cells | |
‘Burned’ | ‘Unburned’ | |
Kivimäensalo | 95% | 5% |
Liesjärvi | 95% | 5% |
Pyhä-Häkki | 92% | 8% |
Nuuksio | 83% | 17% |
Seitseminen | 94% | 6% |
Evo | 51% | 49% |
Ruunaa | 96% | 4% |
Salamajärvi | 71% | 29% |
Fig. 5. Spatial distribution of 1 × 1 m cells classified as ‘burned’ and ‘unburned’ for each controlled burning site. Test sites are oriented in a north-south direction. 1 = Kivimäensalo, 2 = Liesjärvi, 3 = Pyhä-Häkki, 4 = Nuuksio, 5 = Seitseminen, 6 = Evo, 7 = Ruunaa, 8 = Salamajärvi.
Fig. 6. Ground vegetation volumes (including tree stems below 2 m) before and after controlled burnings (a), and total changes (black) with burned (red) and growth (green) volumes (b) at a resolution of 0.1 m. Negative values indicate a decrease and positive values an increase in ground vegetation volume.
Fig. 7. Variation in ground vegetation volume changes in 1 × 1 m cells classified as ‘burned’ and ‘unburned’ in the controlled burning sites. The line in the box center represents the median value; the box represents the middle 50% of the cell values; 25% of the values fall below the lower quartile (bottom of the box), and 75% fall below the upper quartile (top of the box); whiskers represent minimum and maximum cell values. Outliers (i.e., 0.35% of the observations both above and below the whiskers) are not shown in the figure to enhance the display of data distribution and variability. View larger in new window/tab.