Fig. 1. Sampling regions 1–6 used in the 13th National Forest Inventory (NFI13) of Finland. Regions 1–3 form the reporting domain South Finland and regions 4–6 form the reporting domain North Finland.
Table 1. Stratification of first-phase clusters in Northernmost Lapland in the 13th National Forest Inventory of Finland. The proportions were computed from MS-NFI-2019 (multi-source NFI 2019; Mäkisara et al. 2022) land pixels in 4 × 4 pixel windows containing the plot centres. If the mean canopy height (CHM, https://www.metsakeskus.fi/fi/avoin-metsa-ja-luontotieto/metsatietoaineistot/metsavaratiedot) of the pixels around a sample plot location was less than 5 m, then all pixels of that window originally classified as ‘poorly productive forest’ were re-classified into ‘unproductive land’. |
At least one pixel classified into other land use than forestry in MS-NFI-2019 | Stratum 0 |
No other land use pixels | Proportion of productive forest |
≤1% | >1%, ≤25% | >25%, ≤85% | >85% |
Proportion of unproductive land | <10% | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 2 | Stratum 1 |
≥10%, <40% | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 2 | Stratum 2 |
≥40%, ≤85% | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 |
>85% | Stratum 4 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 | Stratum 3 |
Table 2. Land areas represented by strata, number of second-phase clusters and field sample plots on land, as well as land areas represented by one plot in Northernmost Lapland of Finland in NFI13. |
Stratum | Area, km2 | Number of clusters | Number of land plots | area/plot, km2 |
0 | 2552 | 29 | 188 | 13.574 |
1 | 1975 | 27 | 168 | 11.756 |
2 | 6193 | 67 | 457 | 13.551 |
3 | 8834 | 62 | 442 | 19.986 |
4 | 8603 | 11 | 80 | 107.54 |
Northernmost Lapland total | 28 158 | 196 | 1335 | |
Table 3. Number of plot centres in the NFI13 of Finland for the old permanent, new permanent and temporary clusters by land use class. |
Land use class | Temporary clusters | Old permanent clusters | NFI12 established permanent clusters | New NFI13 permanent clusters | Total |
Productive forest | 8641 | 9693 | 16 654 | 8756 | 43 744 |
Poorly productive forest | 768 | 927 | 1169 | 846 | 3710 |
Unproductive land | 714 | 786 | 1193 | 904 | 3597 |
Other forestry land | 98 | 106 | 180 | 111 | 495 |
Forestry land total | 10 221 | 11 512 | 19 196 | 10 617 | 51 546 |
Agriculture land | 1440 | 1610 | 2423 | 1302 | 6775 |
Built-up land | 561 | 630 | 1073 | 515 | 2779 |
Roads | 191 | 200 | 322 | 174 | 887 |
Power lines | 48 | 56 | 115 | 60 | 279 |
Land total | 12 461 | 14 008 | 23 129 | 12 668 | 62 266 |
Fig. 2. An illustration of Voronoi-neigbourhoods of some field plot clusters (black dots) of NFI13 in Finland. Light orange lines show the boundaries of Voronoi-tiles associated to each cluster and dark orange lines connect neighouring clusters, i.e., those with a common boundary segment.
Fig. 3. Area by land use class in 1921–2023 in Finland according to NFI1–NFI13.
Fig. 4. The proportions of site types (fertility classes) (Hotanen et al. 2018b) on mineral soils of the productive forest a) in South and b) in North Finland according to NFI13: 1 = herb-rich forests, 2 = herb-rich heath forests, 3 = mesic heath forests, 4 = sub-xeric heath forests, 5 = xeric heath forests, 6 = barren heath forests, 7 = rocky and sandy soils and alluvial lands.
Fig. 5. The proportions of grouped site types (fertility classes) (Hotanen et al. 2018) on mineral soils in 1951–2023 a) in South Finland and b) in North Finland according to NFI3–NFI13.
Fig. 6. Area of the drained mires by drainage stages and area of drained mineral soil sites in 1951–2023 in Finland according to NFI3–NFI13.
Fig. 7. Area of productive forest by age class and dominant tree species in a) South Finland, b) North Finland, and c) whole Finland according to NFI13.
Fig. 8. Proportion of dominant tree species in productive forests 1921–2021 in a) South Finland, and b) North Finland according to NFI13.
Fig. 9. Proportion of age classes in productive forests 1921–2023 in a) South Finland and b) North Finland according to NFI1-NFI13.
Fig. 10. Total volume of growing stock in a) whole Finland by tree species group and b) South and North Finland according to NFI1–NFI13. Scots pine group in a) includes other conifers than Norway spruce.
Fig. 11. The mean annual volume increment in productive forests by tree species groups according to NFI13 in South Finland, North Finland, and whole country.
Fig. 12. The annual volume increment (M m3) by tree species in a) South Finland, b) North Finland, and c) the whole country 1921–2023 according to NFI1–NFI13. NFI1 estimate is for the territory of Finland of those times, NFI2 estimate for both the current and historical territory of Finland.
Table 4. Average growth indices for the increment measurement periods of NFI13 and NFI12 in South Finland and in North Finland (100 = average level of 1990–2023). |
| Scots pine | Norway spruce | Birch |
NFI | South Finland | North Finland | South Finland | North Finland | South Finland | North Finland |
NFI12 | 104 | 101 | 113 | 101 | 97 | 89 |
NFI13 | 93 | 89 | 110 | 103 | 90 | 90 |
Fig. 13. Annual diameter increment indices in South and North Finland for a) Scots pine b) Norway spruce, and c) birch. Index value 100 is the average in 1990–2023.
Fig. 14. Estimates of annual natural losses (M m3) and its proportion of annual volume increment (%) 1920–2016 according to National Forest Inventories (NFIs) of Finland. Until the 1970s the estimates of annual natural losses are excluding bark.
Table 5. Forest balance between NFI12 and NFI13 mid years (2016–2021) for South Finland, North Finland, and the whole country. Notation: GS12 = Volume for growing stock in NFI12, GS13 = Volume for growing stock in NFI13, Difference = Increment – Drain – (GS13 – GS12). All values are in M m3. |
| GS12 | Increment | Drain | GS12 + Increment – Drain | GS13 | Increment – Drain | GS13 – GS12 | Difference | Standard error of change |
A | B | C | D = A + B – C | E | F = D – A = B – C | G = E – A | F – G |
South Finland |
Scots pine | 713 | 133 | 121 | 726 | 719 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9.2 |
Norway spruce | 572 | 146 | 130 | 588 | 586 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 9.9 |
Broadleaves | 339 | 87 | 89 | 337 | 350 | –2 | 11 | –13 | 5.2 |
Total | 1624 | 366 | 339 | 1651 | 1655 | 27 | 31 | –5 | 15.2 |
North Finland |
Scots pine | 530 | 90 | 56 | 564 | 564 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 9.0 |
Norway spruce | 168 | 31 | 15 | 183 | 177 | 15 | 9 | 7 | 5.2 |
Broadleaves | 153 | 29 | 25 | 157 | 156 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3.6 |
Total | 852 | 149 | 96 | 905 | 897 | 53 | 45 | 8 | 11.0 |
Whole country |
Scots pine | 1244 | 223 | 177 | 1292 | 1283 | 48 | 39 | 8 | 12.9 |
Norway spruce | 740 | 176 | 145 | 772 | 763 | 32 | 23 | 8 | 11.2 |
Broadleaves | 492 | 115 | 113 | 495 | 507 | 3 | 17 | –13 | 6.3 |
Total | 2475 | 515 | 436 | 2558 | 2552 | 83 | 77 | 3 | 18.8 |
Fig. 15. Proportion of damaged area by causing agent group in productive forest available for wood supply in a) South Finland, and b) North Finland according to NFI13.
Fig. 16. Proportion of the most significant causing agents in terms of damaged area in a) pine dominated, b) spruce dominated, and c) broadleaf dominated productive forest available for wood supply in Finland according to NFI13. Proportions are calculated from the forest area dominated by the tree species group in question.
Fig. 17. Proportion of stand quality classes on productive forest available for wood supply in Finland according to NFI3–NFI13.
Fig. 18. Observed area (M ha) of annual thinnings and regeneration cuttings in Finland according to NFI9–NFI13.
Fig. 19. Mean volume of lying and standing dead wood in productive forests according to NFI9–NFI13 in a) South Finland, b) North Finland and c) whole Finland.
Fig. 20. Mean volume of lying and standing dead wood in productive forests available for wood supply (FAWS) according to NFI9–NFI13 in a) South Finland, b) North Finland and c) whole Finland.
Fig. 21. Mean volume of lying and standing dead wood in productive forests not available for wood supply (FNAWS) according to NFI9–NFI13 in a) South Finland, b) North Finland and c) whole Finland.