Table 1. Effect of genotype and collection date on the in vitro establishment of shoot cultures of several adult clones of Alnus glutinosa. | ||||||||
Clone | Flushing capacity (%) | Number of initial explants | Contamination rate (%) | Period needed for stabilization (months) | ||||
June | November | June | November | June | November | June | November | |
R1 | 15.0 | 66.7 | 22.0 | 25.0 | 9.1 | 56.0 | 12 | 12 |
R2 | 44.4 | - | 24.0 | - | 25.0 | - | 10 | - |
R3 | 33.3 | 77.8 | 20.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 57.1 | Lost | 10 |
R4 | 43.8 | 60.0 | 21.0 | 20.0 | 23.8 | 50.0 | Lost | 10 |
G1 | 94.1 | - | 40.0 | - | 15.0 | - | 5 | - |
Table 2. Effect of zeatin regime on the in vitro multiplication of Alnus glutinosa (genotype R4). Data were collected at the end of a 9-week multiplication period. | |||||
Treatment | Response (%) | No. of shoots 0.5–1.0 cm 2) | No. of shoots ≥ 1.0 cm 2) | Total no. of shoots 2) | Longest shoot length (mm) 2) |
Control | 92.6±1.83 | 1.0±0.41a | 0.9±0.09a | 2.0±0.35a | 14.9±0.38a |
Regime 1 1) | 96.3±3.70 | 2.1±0.17b | 1.0±0.11a | 3.1±0.15b | 15.0±0.79a |
Regime 2 | 100.0±0.00 | 1.5±0.18a | 1.3±0.16b | 2.8±0.21c | 16.5±0.79b |
1) Regime 1: Cycle 1: 0.88 µM BA + 2.85 µM IAA, cycle 2: 0.44 µM BA + 2.85 µM IAA, cycle 3: 0.44 µM BA + 2.85 µM IAA + 2.28 µM zeatin. Regime 2: as regime 1 with 2.28 µM zeatin in all cycles. Control without zeatin. Values represent means ± SE for three replications. 2) In each column, values followed by the same letter are not significant at p ≤ 0.05 level using Student’s test |
Table 3. Effect of carbohydrate source (S: sucrose, G: glucose) on the in vitro multiplication of Alnus glutinosa (Genotypes G1 and R4). Data were collected after 9-week multiplication period. | ||||||||||||||
Sugar (%) | Response (%) 1) | No of shoots 0.5–1 cm | No of shoots ≥ 1 cm 2) | Total no of shoots 2) | Shoot length (mm) 2) | |||||||||
S | G | S | G | S | G | S | G | S | G | |||||
G1 | ||||||||||||||
2% | 92.4±0.9 | 100±0.0 | 0.5±0.02 | 0.8±0.02 | 1.1±0.02 | 2.2±0.08 | 1.7±0.02 | 3.1±0.08 | 16.8±0.11 | 23.0±0.44 | ||||
3% | 100±0.0 | 100±0.0 | 0.7±0.03 | 1.1±0.07 | 1.2±0.01 | 2.3±0.08 | 1.9±0.02 | 3.5±0.13 | 17.2±0.37 | 22.4±0.33 | ||||
Mean | 1.2±0.06a | 2.3±0.03b | 1.8±0.1a | 3.3±0.2b | 17.0±0.2a | 22.7±0.3b | ||||||||
R4 | ||||||||||||||
G 2% | 98.0±0.5 | 1.4±0.11 | 2.4±0.04a | 3.8±0.08a | 18.0±0.11a | |||||||||
S 3% | 98.1±0.4 | 0.7±0.03 | 1.4±0.05b | 2.1±0.08b | 16.3±0.20b | |||||||||
1) Percentage of explants that forming shoots. Values represent means ± SE for three replications. 2) In each column, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. |
Table 4. Effect of carbohydrate source and auxin (0.49 µM IBA) on root formation in shoots from Alnus glutinosa (Genotypes G1 and R4). Data were collected after 4 weeks. | ||||||
Rooting treatment | Rooting (%) | Number of roots 1) | Length of longest root (mm) 1) | |||
Sucrose 3% | Glucose 2% | Sucrose 3% | Glucose 2% | Sucrose 3% | Glucose 2% | |
G1 | ||||||
–IBA | 84.0±8.0 | 90.0±10.0 | 2.1±0.1a | 2.1±0.1a | 28.2±0.5 | 30.3±4.5 |
+IBA | 86.9±2.5 | 93.4±6.7 | 2.3±0.1b | 2.0±0.1a | 29.5±1.4 | 32.3±0.3 |
Mean | 28.9±0.6a | 31.3±1.0b | ||||
R4 | ||||||
–IBA | 79.0±2.4 | 79.3±0.7 | 2.5±0.2 | 2.1±0.2 | 32.4±5.0 | 29.7±0.6 |
+IBA | 79.4±2.4 | 85.7±1.1 | 2.6±0.4 | 2.1±0.1 | 34.1±5.0 | 29.2±1.4 |
Mean | 2.3±0.0a | 2.1±0.0b | ||||
Values represent means ± SE for three replicates. 1) In each column, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the P ≤ 0.05 level, according to the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test. |