Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Heikki Ovaskainen (email)

Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments

Ovaskainen H. (2005). Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 1 article id 398. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.398

Abstract

Harvester simulators offer a safe and cost-saving method for studying the basics of harvester controls and working technique. Therefore, harvester simulators are increasingly being used in the education of harvester operators. In this study, the objective was to compare harvester work in real and simulator environments, and to determine how a professional harvester operator’s working technique may have changed in the simulator environment. Specific features of the simulator that encumbered operators’ normal work are also presented; and the correspondence of the simulator to reality is evaluated. The work of six professional harvester operators was studied in thinning and in clear cutting stands in both environments: first in the real forest and thereafter on the simulator. The results indicate that the operators’ working technique on the simulator was mainly the same as in the real forest. This means that the same restrictions are valid on the simulator as in the forest. The basic principles of harvesting must be known so that high productivity and good quality can be obtained. However, certain simulator-specific features encumbered the work of harvester operators. Limited visibility to the side increased the need to reverse and the 3D-visualization caused failed catches. Improvements in software would remove some of the defects, e.g. failed felling and cheating in the felling phase. These results also indicate that simulators can be used for research purposes.

Keywords
time study; single-grip harvester; harvester simulator; working technique; PlusCan

Author Info
  • Ovaskainen, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail heikki.ovaskainen@joensuu.fi (email)

Received 11 May 2004 Accepted 27 August 2004 Published 31 December 2005

Views 4831

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.398 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Mattila E., (1998) Use of satellite and field information in a fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 2 article id 692 (remove) | Edit comment
Saramäki J., (1992) A growth and yield prediction model of Pinus kes.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 230 article id 7676 (remove) | Edit comment
Svinhufvud V. E., (1937) Studies on the microbiological differences in so.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 7329 (remove) | Edit comment
Wermann E., (1993) Outlooks of forestry in the European Community w.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5498 (remove) | Edit comment
Nurmi J., (1997) Heating values of mature trees Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 256 article id 7517 (remove) | Edit comment
Ovaskainen H., (2005) Comparison of harvester work in forest and simul.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 1 article id 398 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results