Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Annikki Mäkelä (email), Thomas J. Givnish, Frank Berninger, Thomas N. Buckley, Graham D. Farquhar, Pertti Hari

Challenges and opportunities of the optimality approach in plant ecology

Mäkelä A., Givnish T. J., Berninger F., Buckley T. N., Farquhar G. D., Hari P. (2002). Challenges and opportunities of the optimality approach in plant ecology. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 528. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.528

Abstract

A meeting was held in Hyytiälä, Finland 10–12 April 2000 to assess critically the current challenges and limitations of the optimality approach in plant ecophysiology and botany. This article summarises the general discussions and views of the participants on the use of optimisation models as tools in plant ecophysiological research. A general framework of the evolutionary optimisation problem is sketched with a review of applications, typically involved with balanced regulation between parallel processes. The usefulness and limitations of the approach are discussed in terms of published examples, with special reference to model testing. We conclude that, regardless of inevitable problems of model formulation, wider application of the optimality approach could provide a step forward in plant ecophysiology. A major role of evolutionary theory in this process is simply the formulation of testable hypotheses, the evaluation of which can lead to important advances in our ecophysiological understanding and predictive ability.

Keywords
models; acclimation; adaptation; optimisation; evolution; hypotheses; evaluation

Author Info
  • Mäkelä, University of Helsinki, Dept. of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail annikki.makela@helsinki.fi (email)
  • Givnish, University of Wisconsin, Department of Botany, Madison, WI 53706 USA E-mail tjg@nn.us
  • Berninger, University of Helsinki, Dept. of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail fb@nn.fi
  • Buckley, Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting and Environmental Biology Group, and Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia E-mail tnb@nn.au
  • Farquhar, Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Accounting and Environmental Biology Group, and Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, ACT 2601, Australia E-mail gdf@nn.au
  • Hari, University of Helsinki, Dept. of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail ph@nn.fi

Received 4 July 2001 Accepted 8 August 2002 Published 31 December 2002

Views 10042

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.528 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Park B.-J., Morikawa T. et al. (2009) Physiological effects of ingesting eucalyptus es.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 1 article id 223 (remove) | Edit comment
Rompaey R. S.A.R. v., (1996) Need for integrated policy oriented national res.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5596 (remove) | Edit comment
Heiskanen V., (1951) Methods of saw log classification according to q.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 69 article id 4610 (remove) | Edit comment
Maltamo M., (2021) 100 years of national forest inventories Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10643 (remove) | Edit comment
Spinelli R., Owende P. M. O. et al. (2004) Comparison of short-wood forwarding systems used.. Silva Fennica vol. 38 no. 1 article id 437 (remove) | Edit comment
Fox J. C., Bi H. et al. (2008) Modelling spatial dependence in an irregular nat.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 1 article id 262 (remove) | Edit comment
Mäkelä A., Givnish T. J. et al. (2002) Challenges and opportunities of the optimality a.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 528 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results