Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Jianbang Gan (email), C. T. Smith

Coupling greenhouse gas credits with biofuel production cost in determining conversion plant size

Gan J., Smith C. T. (2010). Coupling greenhouse gas credits with biofuel production cost in determining conversion plant size. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 3 article id 145. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.145

Abstract

Biofuel plant size is one of the key variables in biofuel supply chain analysis as it plays a pivotal role in controlling the efficacy of both feedstock supply and feedstock-to-biofuel conversion. The unit production cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of biofuels vary with plant size. We develop an analytical framework for integrating biofuel production costs and GHG balance derived from life-cycle analysis into supply chain optimization, followed by its application to ethanol production using forest biomass in the southern United States. We derive formulas for determining the optimal biofuel plant size and the corresponding feedstock supply radius based on the minimization of biofuel production costs less GHG benefits. Our results indicate that though biofuel plant size and feedstock supply radius should be augmented by considering GHG benefits, the GHG price will have a more significant impact on net biofuel production costs than on conversion plant size or feedstock supply radius. With a rise in the GHG price the net biofuel production cost tends to increase while the directions of change in plant size and feedstock supply radius are uncertain, depending upon the costs and GHG emissions of biomass transport and feedstock-to-fuel conversion. Combining GHG offset values with biofuel production costs enables us to more holistically examine the biofuel supply chain.

Keywords
bioethanol; production cost; carbon balance; feedstock supply radius; life-cycle analysis

Author Info
  • Gan, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA E-mail j-gan@tamu.edu (email)
  • Smith, Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada E-mail cts@nn.ca

Received 1 October 2009 Accepted 3 March 2010 Published 31 December 2010

Views 6850

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.145 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Rekola M., Nippala J. et al. (2018) Modelling competences and anticipating the futur.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 9983 (remove) | Edit comment
Lifländer A., (1957) Centralized fellings in Northern Finland and the.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 92 article id 4655 (remove) | Edit comment
Schibalski A., Lehtonen A. et al. (2017) Identifying important topics for model refinemen.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 4 article id 6977 (remove) | Edit comment
Lindström H., (2000) Intra-tree models of basic density in Norway spr.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 622 (remove) | Edit comment
Klemetti V.-K., (1957) Evaluation of growing stock in the pricing of se.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 92 article id 4664 (remove) | Edit comment
Hämäläinen J., Kuula M. (1992) An integrated planning model for a farm with an .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 234 article id 7680 (remove) | Edit comment
Huhta V., Hyvönen R. et al. (1986) Response of soil fauna to fertilization and mani.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 195 article id 7641 (remove) | Edit comment
Linkola K., (1930) On half-deciduous woodlands in Estonia Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 7261 (remove) | Edit comment
DeLong S. C., (2002) Using nature’s template to best advantage in the.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 571 (remove) | Edit comment
Felton A., Andersson E. et al. (2011) A comparison of avian diversity in spruce monocu.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 5 article id 92 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results