Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Eeva-Liisa Jukola-Sulonen (email), Maija Salemaa

A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis.

Jukola-Sulonen E.-L., Salemaa M. (1985). A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 3 article id 5247. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426

Abstract

Different sampling methods (the percentage cover scale, the graphical method, two-point quadrat methods, the five-, nine- and twelve-class cover scales, and the biomass harvesting) were used in estimating abundance of ground vegetation in clear-cut areas and on an abandoned field in Southern and Central Finland. The results are examined with the help of DCA ordinations. In addition, the species numbers and diversity indices obtained by different sampling methods are compared.

There were no large differences in DCA configurations between the sampling methods. According to all the sampling methods, a complex soil fertility-moisture gradient (a forest site type) was interpreted as the main ordination gradient in the vegetation data for clear-cut areas. However, different sampling methods did not give similar estimates of species numbers and diversity indices.

The PDF includes a summary in Finnish.

Keywords
clear-cutting; vegetation analysis; sampling methods; abundance of ground vegetation; species numbers; diversity indices

Published in 1985

Views 6309

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Auer V., (1920) The development of the hummock ridges on the pea.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 12 no. 2 article id 7029 (remove) | Edit comment
Nygren P., (2021) What is similarity check? Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10682 (remove) | Edit comment
Rantonen H., Päivänen J. (1989) Silvicultural condition of tree stands after thi.. Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 1 article id 5370 (remove) | Edit comment
Multamäki S. E., (1934) Changing of dimensions and form of forest ditche.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 34 article id 7311 (remove) | Edit comment
Hertz M., (1934) Forest Sercvice of Finland in 1859‒1934 Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 43 no. 1 article id 7327 (remove) | Edit comment
Fahlvik N., Elfving B. et al. (2014) Evaluation of growth functions used in the Swedi.. Silva Fennica vol. 48 no. 2 article id 1013 (remove) | Edit comment
Finnish Society of Forest Science ., (1976) Research seminar on goal orientation and forest .. Silva Fennica vol. 10 no. 1 article id 4933 (remove) | Edit comment
Numminen J., (1970) Regional variation of the profitability of fores.. Silva Fennica vol. 4 no. 4 article id 4829 (remove) | Edit comment
Backman A. L., Cleve-Euler A. (1922) The fossil diatom (Diatomeae) flora in Ostroboth.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 22 no. 4 article id 7073 (remove) | Edit comment
Salminen H., Varmola M. (1993) Influence of initial spacing and planting design.. Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 1 article id 5495 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., (1973) Ground cover response to trampling in a spruce s.. Silva Fennica vol. 7 no. 2 article id 4880 (remove) | Edit comment
Leinonen I., Hänninen H. (2002) Adaptation of the timing of bud burst of Norway .. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 534 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results