Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Eeva-Liisa Jukola-Sulonen (email), Maija Salemaa

A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis.

Jukola-Sulonen E.-L., Salemaa M. (1985). A comparison of different sampling methods of quantitative vegetation analysis. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 3 article id 5247. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426

Abstract

Different sampling methods (the percentage cover scale, the graphical method, two-point quadrat methods, the five-, nine- and twelve-class cover scales, and the biomass harvesting) were used in estimating abundance of ground vegetation in clear-cut areas and on an abandoned field in Southern and Central Finland. The results are examined with the help of DCA ordinations. In addition, the species numbers and diversity indices obtained by different sampling methods are compared.

There were no large differences in DCA configurations between the sampling methods. According to all the sampling methods, a complex soil fertility-moisture gradient (a forest site type) was interpreted as the main ordination gradient in the vegetation data for clear-cut areas. However, different sampling methods did not give similar estimates of species numbers and diversity indices.

The PDF includes a summary in Finnish.

Keywords
clear-cutting; vegetation analysis; sampling methods; abundance of ground vegetation; species numbers; diversity indices

Published in 1985

Views 3375

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15426 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Parviainen J., (1985) Growth of young Scots pine, Norway spruce, siber.. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 4 article id 5249 (remove) | Edit comment
Huuri O., (1965) The effects of storage in cones on the viability.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 78 no. 5 article id 7158 (remove) | Edit comment
Smolander H., (1984) Measurement of fluctuating irradiance in field s.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 187 article id 7634 (remove) | Edit comment
Ruel J. J., Ayres M. P. (1996) Variation in temperature responses among populat.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5582 (remove) | Edit comment
Heliövaara K., Väisänen R. et al. (1991) Quantitative biogeography of the bark beetles (C.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 219 article id 7606 (remove) | Edit comment
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282 (remove) | Edit comment
Calama R., Montero G. (2005) Multilevel linear mixed model for tree diameter .. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 1 article id 394 (remove) | Edit comment
Laitakari E., (1959) The first half century of the Society of Forestr.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 70 no. 2 article id 7492 (remove) | Edit comment
Jukola-Sulonen E.-L., Salemaa M. (1985) A comparison of different sampling methods of qu.. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 3 article id 5247 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results