P. A. Harou 
Comparison of methodologies to evaluate aid programs to nonindustrial private forests.
Harou P. A. (1985). Comparison of methodologies to evaluate aid programs to nonindustrial private forests. Silva Fennica vol. 19 no. 4 article id 5250. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15429
Abstract
A methodology to evaluate forestry programs aimed at increasing timber supply from nonindustrial private forests is presented that aggregates the marginal social cost and marginal social benefit of a sample program participants and compares them in a benefit-cost efficiency ratio. The paper exposes a methodology followed to evaluate several forestry programs in Massachusetts, USA, and discusses its advantages and inconveniences compared to the other methodologies that have been used for the same purpose. The marginal analysis is based on detailed property and landowner behaviour surveys which are costly but represent a good standard to compare the performance of other approaches.
The PDF includes a summary in Finnish.
Keywords
forest policy;
timber supply;
United States;
aid programmes;
privat forestry;
privat forests;
forest programs;
Massachusetts
Published in 1985
Views 1449
Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a15429 | Download PDF
