Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Gösta Eriksson (email)

Evolutionary forces influencing variation among populations of Pinus sylvestris

Eriksson G. (1998). Evolutionary forces influencing variation among populations of Pinus sylvestris. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 2 article id 694. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.694

Abstract

The evolutionary forces influencing genetic differentiation among populations are identified. Natural selection, random genetic drift, and mutations promote differentiation while phenotypic plasticity and gene flow delay or prevent differentiation. Evolution is a dynamic force which leads to instability and absence of any perfection in the adaptive process. Natural selection acts mainly on phenotypes and only indirectly on the components of important breeding traits. In the northern part of the distribution of Scots pine there is a large among- and within-population variation in survival. The high among-population variation occurs in spite of an assumed high gene flow. Biomass is a product of many components and it also shows a high population variation. Many markers are neutral and such markers will not reveal adaptive variation.

Keywords
Pinus sylvestris; Scots pine; among-population variation; evolutionary forces

Author Info
  • Eriksson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Genetics, Uppsala, Sweden E-mail gosta.eriksson@sgen.slu.se (email)

Received 9 November 1994 Accepted 7 May 1998 Published 31 December 1998

Views 4559

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.694 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Kallio T., (1976) Peniophora gigantea (Fr.) Massee and wounded spr.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 149 article id 7583 (remove) | Edit comment
Belbo H., (2010) Comparison of two working methods for small tree.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 3 article id 142 (remove) | Edit comment
Čugunovs M., Tuittila E.-S. et al. (2017) Recovery of boreal forest soil and tree stand ch.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 5 article id 7723 (remove) | Edit comment
Ihalainen M., Salo K. et al. (2003) Empirical prediction models for Vaccinium myrtil.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 1 article id 513 (remove) | Edit comment
Kankare V., Luoma V. et al. (2019) Assessing feasibility of the forest trafficabili.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10197 (remove) | Edit comment
Pärnänen A., (1979) Ecological effects of different land uses and ma.. Silva Fennica vol. 13 no. 2 article id 5023 (remove) | Edit comment
Nuorteva M., Saari L. (1996) Winter ecology of a female White-backed Woodpeck.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 1 article id 5576 (remove) | Edit comment
Kretschmer U., Kirchner N. et al. (2013) A new approach to assessing tree stem quality ch.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 5 article id 1071 (remove) | Edit comment
Piha A., (1941) Revenue of farm forests in Finland Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 49 no. 5 article id 7352 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., (1978) Recreational potential of a forest stand. Silva Fennica vol. 12 no. 3 article id 5001 (remove) | Edit comment
Saarilahti M., (1981) Sinkage of forest machines during harvesting ope.. Silva Fennica vol. 15 no. 3 article id 5126 (remove) | Edit comment
Nikinmaa E., (1992) Analyses of the growth of Scots pine: matching s.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 235 article id 7681 (remove) | Edit comment
Kupila-Ahvenniemi S., Hankonen S. et al. (1974) Experiments on the determination of certain elem.. Silva Fennica vol. 8 no. 3 article id 4904 (remove) | Edit comment
Eriksson G., (1998) Evolutionary forces influencing variation among .. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 2 article id 694 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results