Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Metsänhoidon edistämiskomitea (email)

Yksityismetsätalouden edistäminen

Metsänhoidon edistämiskomitea . (1938). Yksityismetsätalouden edistäminen. Silva Fennica no. 45 article id 4545. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9070

English title: Promotion of private forestry in Finland

Abstract

The government of Finland appointed a commission to study how the work of forest owners’ associations could be promoted. In 1936 there was 232 forest owners’ associations in Finland. They had 20,632 members, who owned 1,841,304 hectares of forests. The owners of large forest holdings were overpresented among the members. The associations together with forestry boards were important actors in increasing the productivity of the private forests.

The commission concluded that rational forest management should be extended to all private forests, which could be best achieved through the forest owners’ associations. It suggested that the membership should remain voluntary, and that the financing of the associations would be arranged by self-taxation of the forest owners. The so called forest management tax should be devoted to the local forest owners’ associations. Also the state should continue to support the associations. Both state and the smallest forest holdings would be released from the forest management tax. The companies, estates and other large forest owners that employ their own forest management staff would pay a quarter of the tax. The tax could be based on the area of the forest, income of the timber sold or a combination of these. The commission suggested a forest management law, which would deal with the forest management tax and the forest owners’ associations.
The PDF includes a summary in Swedish and English.

Original keywords
metsänhoito; yksityismetsätalous; metsälaki; metsänhoitolautakunta; metsänhoitomaksu; metsänhoitoyhdistys

English keywords
forest management; forest taxation; legislation; private forests; forest owners’ association; forestry board

Published in 1938

Views 5095

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9070 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Jin X., Pukkala T. et al. (2019) Developing growth models for tree plantations us.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 4 article id 10217 (remove) | Edit comment
Blomqvist M., Lyytikäinen-Saarenmaa P. et al. (2016) Impacts of natural enemies and stand characteris.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 5 article id 1615 (remove) | Edit comment
Renvall A., (1919) Protection forests III. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 11 no. 2-3 article id 7023 (remove) | Edit comment
Teikmanis Andr., (1929) Forests and timber exports of Latvia Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 34 no. 22 article id 7235 (remove) | Edit comment
Mikola P., (1971) Integration on timber production and forest recr.. Silva Fennica vol. 5 no. 4 article id 4855 (remove) | Edit comment
Repo T., Volanen V. et al. (2022) No difference in the maximum frost hardiness of .. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10620 (remove) | Edit comment
Kalliola R., (1942) Vegetation and flora in the Pyhätunturi National.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 59 article id 4579 (remove) | Edit comment
Blumenthal B.-E., (1942) Distribution and properties of aspen in Finland Silva Fennica vol. no. 56 article id 4576 (remove) | Edit comment
Deckmyn G., Mali B. et al. (2009) Using the process-based stand model ANAFORE incl.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 204 (remove) | Edit comment
Fedorkov A., (2001) Climatic adaptation of seed maturity in Scots pi.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 1 article id 609 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results