Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Mirja Rantala, Teppo Hujala, Mikko Kurttila (email)

Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustainability in the action of forest biodiversity cooperation networks

Rantala M., Hujala T., Kurttila M. (2012). Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustainability in the action of forest biodiversity cooperation networks. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.52

Abstract

To safeguard overall sustainability in forest resource management, the ecological, economic, social, and cultural dimensions of sustainability should all be considered. However, the socio-cultural impacts are frequently contemplated only weakly in sustainability assessments. Hitherto, attempts to operationalize socio-cultural impacts arising from economic utilization or conservation of forest resources have been perceived as vague when compared to rigorous ecological and economic indicators. One reason is that socio-cultural impacts of forest management on individuals and communities are many and by nature context- and case-specific: they need local definition, which hampers diffusion of good solutions. This study developed a multi-criteria method for measuring and monitoring socio-cultural impacts of forest resource management; the case of cooperation network projects within Forest Biodiversity Programme for Southern Finland (METSO) provided empirical data. Based on a literature review, a set of 10 criteria and 25 indicators was compiled. Cumulative utility scores, presenting networks’ contributions to socio-cultural sustainability, were generated using performance, expert evaluation and weighting data and an additive utility model. The method enables longitudinal monitoring of socio-cultural impacts, which is beneficial because outcomes are different at different time points of projects’ life cycles and some appear with a delay. The method can be used in comparing sub-utility distributions i.e. monitoring units’ performance profiles, providing valuable information for policy-makers. The multi-criteria approach and the list of socio-cultural criteria are internationally transferable to other countries and contexts such as forest bioenergy, nature tourism, watershed management, that call for analysing socio-cultural impacts of forest resource management activity on private lands.

Keywords
additive utility function; community adaptation; criteria and indicators; METSO programme

Author Info
  • Rantala, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Unit, P.O. Box 68, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mr@nn.fi
  • Hujala, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Unit, Vantaa, Finland E-mail th@nn.fi
  • Kurttila, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Unit, P.O. Box 68, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mikko.kurttila@metla.fi (email)

Received 30 March 2012 Accepted 4 July 2012 Published 31 December 2012

Views 4586

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.52 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Wallius V., Kunttu J. et al. (2024) Attractiveness of wood-frame multi-storey buildi.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 5 article id 23035
Laakkonen A., Rusanen K. et al. (2023) Implications of the sustainability transition on.. Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 3 article id 23024
Laakkonen A., Hujala T. et al. (2022) Defining the systemic development of the Finnish.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10599
Lähtinen K., Häyrinen L. et al. (2021) Consumer housing values and prejudices against l.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 2 article id 10503
Hamunen K., Virkkula O. et al. (2015) Enhancing informal interaction and knowledge co-.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 1 article id 1214
Rantala M., Hujala T. et al. (2012) Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustaina.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52
Hokajärvi R., Hujala T. et al. (2009) Effectiveness of sermon policy instruments: fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 5 article id 178
Kangas A., Hujala T. (2015) Challenges in publishing: producing, assuring an.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 4 article id 1304