Matti Maltamo

What does it actually mean to measure a sample plot in forest?

Maltamo M. (2023). What does it actually mean to measure a sample plot in forest? Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.23005

Author Info
  • Maltamo, University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Science, Forestry and Technology, Joensuu ORCID 0000-0002-9904-3371 E-mail matti.maltamo@uef.fi

Received 24 January 2023 Accepted 26 January 2023 Published 26 January 2023

Views 9978

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.23005 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0 full-model-article23005

Sample plot measurement is one of the basic operations in forest sciences. A plot is delineated and usually some forest level information is gathered. A certain minimum size in tree level measurements is often applied. Nowadays electronic devices including hypsometer and caliper are utilized when a human is measuring trees. Tally tree measurement usually include diameter at breast height (DBH), tree classifications (living or dead, tree storey, health, timber assortment) and registration of tree species. Tree height is also measured at least from chosen sample trees from which also other attributes, such as age, crown height and growth, are considered. There may be also many other measurements, but this is a basic set of information for forest resource calculation or field reference of remote sensing-based modelling of forest attributes. The purpose of a sample plot measurement may, of course, be other than determining growing stock, for example soil, ground vegetation and health to mention a few, but tree stock measurement is typically needed in those cases, too.

Recently, many remote sensing-based systems have been used in field measurements. These include, e.g., terrestrial and mobile laser scanning (TLS and MLS, respectively). Smartphone based applications, such as Trestima have also been widely applied. Even unmanned aerial vehicles has been experimented. TLS can provide highly detailed information on recognized tree trunks and crowns (Luoma 2022) – partly information, which has never been available earlier or at least these measurements have been very slow and expensive to carry out. TLS information has many different scientific uses. Correspondingly, MLS operated from a harvester will provide in the near future a completely new type of information in forest operations. Although these information sources provide detailed data, the interpretation result of these data should be considered as an accurate forest resource estimate, not a sample plot measurement. This is due to a couple of facts. In a remote sensing-based interpretation, only a proportion of trees is recognized. By applying remote sensing, it is impossible to find all trees in all type of forests. On the other hand, sample plot measurement requires measurement of all trees belonging to a stratum. Of course, some trees may be forgotten to be measured in the “traditional field work” but this refers to single cases. Another, even more serious bottleneck is tree species recognition. In Finland, remote sensing-based interpretation usually provides information on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and combined broadleaved species class. However, this information is not correct. In a sample plot measurement, species should be correctly registered. Especially in the National Forest Inventory type of measurements this refers to all species. If there is, for example, bird cherry (Prunus padus L.) in a plot, it must be registered or should be recognized. In an Austrian field data set, there were over 20 tree species (Gollob 2022). It is not possible to recognize all of them by TLS data, for example.

Despite these problems, I still see possibilities for remote sensing-based sample plot measurement. This is not my research topic, but my personal opinion is that personal laser scanning (PLS) could be a tool for that. PLS is an approach where the laser scanner is operated by a human. Sample plot measurement can be organized so that each tree in a plot is walked around (Gollob 2022). This removes the problem of tree recognition with the exception of some tree groups. During the scanning, the operator can register tree species correctly. Nowadays, there are already rather cheap tablet or smartphone-based applications of PLS. The accuracy of these devices in tree trunk dimension estimation may need to be still improved, but this an obvious step towards remote sensing-based sample plot measurement. One may still ask, what is the benefit of walking around all trees with tablet compared to traditional field work. At least the provided point clouds offer more versatile information on trees and close surroundings around them – not only the DBH.

Matti Maltamo
Editor-in-Chief

References

Gollob C (2022) Mensuration using modern sensor technology in forest inventory. Doctoral thesis. The University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Vienna, Austria.

Luoma V (2022) Measuring tree growth using terrestrial laser scanning. Dissertationes Forestales 329. https://doi.org/10.14214/df.329.


Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email
Repo T., Volanen V. et al. (2022) No difference in the maximum frost hardiness of .. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10620 (remove) | Edit comment
Laitila J., Lehtonen E. et al. (2016) Procurement costs of cereal straw and forest chi.. Silva Fennica vol. 50 no. 5 article id 1689 (remove) | Edit comment
Nikkanen T., (2001) Reproductive phenology in a Norway spruce seed o.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 1 article id 602 (remove) | Edit comment
Hertz M., (1935) The early development of Norway spruce root system Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 7316 (remove) | Edit comment
Järvinen O., Kuusela K. et al. (1977) Effects of modern forestry on the numbers of bre.. Silva Fennica vol. 11 no. 4 article id 4982 (remove) | Edit comment
Selochnik N. N., Pashenova N. V. et al. (2015) Ophiostomatoid fungi and their roles in Querc.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 5 article id 1328 (remove) | Edit comment
Suominen O., (1963) Susceptibility of stands to devastation by snow... Silva Fennica vol. no. 112 article id 4707 (remove) | Edit comment
Finnish Society of Forest Science ., (1967) Forestry research in Finland and its further dev.. Silva Fennica vol. 1 no. 4 article id 4757 (remove) | Edit comment
Poso S., Paananen R. et al. (1987) Forest inventory by compartments using satellite.. Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 1 article id 5307 (remove) | Edit comment
Coussement J. R., Steppe K. et al. (2018) A flexible geometric model for leaf shape descri.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 2 article id 7740 (remove) | Edit comment
Ilvessalo Y., (1916) The growth of the dominant trees in Scots pine f.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 6 no. 1 article id 7012 (remove) | Edit comment
Pietarinen J., (1987) Man and the forest Silva Fennica vol. 21 no. 4 article id 5322 (remove) | Edit comment
Keltikangas V., (1939) Value of forest land in the financial accounting.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 47 no. 4 article id 7344 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., (1977) Trails in guiding recreational activity in Helsi.. Silva Fennica vol. 11 no. 4 article id 4979 (remove) | Edit comment
Kellomäki S., Pohjapelto P. (1976) The distribution of throughfall in a virgin spru.. Silva Fennica vol. 10 no. 2 article id 4941 (remove) | Edit comment
Roitto Y., (1976) The economic transport unit size in roundwood to.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 153 article id 7587 (remove) | Edit comment
Puttonen P., (1988) Presentation report of evaluation group on fores.. Silva Fennica vol. 22 no. 4 article id 5365 (remove) | Edit comment
Mikola P., (1984) Selection system in timber harvesting in Finland Silva Fennica vol. 18 no. 3 article id 5220 (remove) | Edit comment
Lovén L., (1974) Regional landscape planning of forest areas Silva Fennica vol. 8 no. 3 article id 4906 (remove) | Edit comment
Lihtonen V., (1951) Large scale worksites Silva Fennica vol. no. 69 article id 4603 (remove) | Edit comment
Saastamoinen O., (1977) Economics of forest uses in Finnish Lapland. Silva Fennica vol. 11 no. 3 article id 4973 (remove) | Edit comment
Lukkala O. J., (1939) Forest management of forests in drained peatland.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 52 article id 4567 (remove) | Edit comment
Saari E., (1938) Calculating the annual financial performance of .. Silva Fennica vol. no. 46 article id 4528 (remove) | Edit comment
Kalela A., (1939) On meadows and meadow alike vegetation communiti.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 48 no. 2 article id 7347 (remove) | Edit comment
Légaré S., Bergeron Y. et al. (2002) Influence of forest composition on understory co.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 1 article id 567 (remove) | Edit comment
Holopainen V., (1960) Central marketing of cellulose, with particular .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 73 no. 2 article id 7124 (remove) | Edit comment
Solantie R., (1983) Concepts of continentality-oceanity and humidity.. Silva Fennica vol. 17 no. 1 article id 5178 (remove) | Edit comment
Metsäpelto E. E., (1940) Jointly owned forests in Finland Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 49 no. 1 article id 7348 (remove) | Edit comment
Maltamo M., (2023) What does it actually mean to measure a sample p.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005 (remove) | Edit comment
Your search results