Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Mauno Pesonen (email)

Non-industrial private forest landowners’ choices of timber management strategies and potential allowable cut

Pesonen M. (1995). Non-industrial private forest landowners’ choices of timber management strategies and potential allowable cut. Acta Forestalia Fennica no. 247 article id 7509. https://doi.org/10.14214/aff.7509

Abstract

In the study, the potential allowable cut in the district of North-Savo, Eastern Finland was clarified  based on the non-industrial private forest landowners’ (NIPF) choices of timber management strategies. Alternative timber management strategies were generated, and the choices and factors affecting the choices of timber management strategies by NIPF landowners were studied. The choices of timber management strategies were solved by maximizing the utility functions of the NIPF landowners. The parameters of the utility functions were estimated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).

The level of the potential allowable cut was compared to the cutting budgets based on the 7th and 8th National Forest Inventories (NFI7, NFI8) in Finland, to the combining of private forestry plans, and to the realized drain from non-industrial private forests. The potential allowable cut was calculated using the MELA system that has been used in calculating the national cutting budget.

The data consisted of the NIPF holdings that had been inventoried compartmentwise and had forestry plans made in 1984–92. The NIPF landowners’ choices of timber management strategies were clarified by a mail inquiry.

The most preferred strategy obtained was ”sustainability” (chosen by 62% of landowners). The second was ”finance” (17%) and the third ”savings” (11%). ”No cuttings”, and ”maximum cuttings” were the least preferred (9% and 1%, resp.). The factors promoting the choices of strategies with intensive cuttings were: a) ”farmer as forest owner” and ”owing fields”, b) ”increase in the size of the forest holding”, c) agriculture and forestry orientation in production, d) ”decreasing short-term stumpage earnings expectations”, e) ”increasing intensity of future cuttings”, and f) ”choice of forest taxation system based on site productivity”.

The potential allowable cut defined in the study was 20% higher than the average of the realized drain in 1988–93, which was at the same level as the cutting budget based on the combining of forestry plans in Eastern Finland. The potential allowable cut defined in the study was 12% lower than the NFI8-based greatest sustained allowable cut for the 1990. Using the method, timber management strategies can be clarified for private forest owners.

Keywords
non-industrial private forest owners; utility function; Analytic Hierarchy Process; potential allowable cut; timber management strategy

Published in 1995

Views 1449

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/aff.7509 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Pesonen M., Kettunen A. et al. (1995) Modelling non-industrial private forest landowne.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5555
Hyder A. S., Lönnstedt L. et al. (1994) Outline of accounting for non-industrial private.. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 2 article id 5401
Järveläinen V.-P., (1993) Private forestry and the changing values Silva Fennica vol. 27 no. 3 article id 5516
Shimotori S., (1986) Private and municipal forests and the forestry p.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5299
Cubbage F. W., Hodges D. G. (1986) Public and private technical assistance programs.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5298
Gendreau C., (1986) Historical considerations and evolution of the f.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5293
Järveläinen V.-P., (1986) Effects of forestry extension on the use of allo.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5290
Löfgren K. G., (1986) Effects of permanent and non-permanent forest po.. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 4 article id 5289
The Forest 2000 Programme sub-commitee ., (1986) The Forest 2000 Programme in Finland. Silva Fennica vol. 20 no. 1 article id 5260
Hahtola K., Järveläinen V.-P. et al. (1973) The timber-sales behaviour of private forest own.. Silva Fennica vol. 7 no. 3 article id 4884
Ervasti S., Heikinheimo L. et al. (1965) The development of Finland's forests in 1964-2000. Silva Fennica vol. no. 117 article id 4724
Yli-Vakkuri P., (1955) Studies on crop marking of District Forestry Boa.. Silva Fennica vol. no. 87 article id 4646
Linnamies O., (1961) The allowable cut in the State Forests of Finlan.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 74 no. 4 article id 7131
Holopainen V., (1960) Marketing roundwood in Finland and the Scandinav.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 72 no. 4 article id 7121
Pesonen M., Kettunen A. et al. (1995) Non-industrial private forest landowners’ choice.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 250 article id 7512
Haataja L., Kankaanhuhta V. et al. (2018) Reliability of self-control method in the manage.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 1 article id 1665
Hokajärvi R., Hujala T. et al. (2009) Effectiveness of sermon policy instruments: fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 5 article id 178
Kangas J., Leskinen P. et al. (2000) Integrating timber price scenario modeling with .. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 621
Lausti A., Penttinen M. (1998) The analysis of return and its components of non.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 701
Karppinen H., (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private .. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 699
Kärhä K., Oinas S. (1998) Satisfaction and company loyalty as expressed by.. Silva Fennica vol. 32 no. 1 article id 698
Zhang Y., Zhang D. et al. (2005) Small-scale non-industrial private forest owners.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 3 article id 378