Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Erkki Annila (email), Bo Långström, Martti Varama, Risto Hiukka, Pekka Niemelä

Susceptibility of defoliated Scots pine to spontaneous and induced attack by Tomicus piniperda and Tomicus minor

Annila E., Långström B., Varama M., Hiukka R., Niemelä P. (1999). Susceptibility of defoliated Scots pine to spontaneous and induced attack by Tomicus piniperda and Tomicus minor. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 2 article id 660. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.660

Abstract

In 1990–1991, Diprion pini extensively defoliated Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees in Lauhanvuori National Park in southwestern Finland. Many trees lost all their foliage, while others had ca. 10% foliage left after the second year of defoliation. Outside the national park, many nearby stands were also heavily defoliated in 1990, but were sprayed with diflubenzuron (Dimilin®) in 1991. This protected the current year needles, corresponding to ca 30% of full foliage. In spring 1992, pine trees with 0, 10, 30 and 100% foliage remaining (10 small and 10 large trees in each category) were baited with pine bolts to induce stem attacks by pine shoot beetles. All baited trees were attacked by Tomicus piniperda and some by T. minor. The attacks failed in all these trees except those that were totally defoliated and some of the small trees with 10% foliage left. Many unbaited trees escaped attack entirely, but only totally defoliated trees were successfully colonized (i.e. produced brood). Attack densities and brood production figures peaked in baited, large and totally defoliated trees. None of the measures (cambial electrical resistance, resin flow, induced lesion length by fungal inoculation, amount of hydrocarbons or phenolic compounds) used to describe tree vigour at the time of attack gave better information than the estimated remaining foliage. We conclude that the risk for beetle-induced mortality following defoliation is a function of remaining needle biomass and beetle pressure. Even at high beetle densities (as was simulated by baiting of trees), trees with 10% of the foliage remaining were able to defend themselves against attacking pine shoot beetles.

Keywords
Scots pine; defoliation; Scolytidae; Diprionidae; induced attack; Tomicus piniperda; Tomicus minor; Diprion pini

Author Info
  • Annila, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland E-mail erkki.annila@metla.fi (email)
  • Långström, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept of Entomology, P. O. Box 7044, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden E-mail bl@nn.fi
  • Varama, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland E-mail mv@nn.fi
  • Hiukka, Finnish Forest Research Institute, P.O. Box 18, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland E-mail rh@nn.fi
  • Niemelä, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, P.O. Box 111, FIN-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail pn@nn.fi

Received 8 December 1997 Accepted 20 April 1999 Published 31 December 1999

Views 4984

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.660 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Jääskelä M., Heliövaara K. et al. (1997) Comparison of protection methods of pine stacks .. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 2 article id 5614
Långström B., Hellqvist C. (1991) Shoot damage and growth losses following three y.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 3 article id 5450
Långström B., (1984) Windthrown Scots pines as brood material for Tom.. Silva Fennica vol. 18 no. 2 article id 5213
Saalas U., (1919) Bark beetles and insect damages in Finnish forest Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 10 no. 1 article id 7088
Melin M., Ylioja T. et al. (2021) Emergence levels of pine shoot beetles from roun.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10525
Kurkela T., Aalto T. et al. (2005) Defoliation by the common pine sawfly (Diprion p.. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 4 article id 360