Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Annika Kangas (email), Matti Maltamo

Anticipating the variance of predicted stand volume and timber assortments with respect to stand characteristics and field measurements

Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002). Anticipating the variance of predicted stand volume and timber assortments with respect to stand characteristics and field measurements. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 522. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.522

Abstract

Several models and/or several variable combinations could be used to predict the diameter distribution of a stand. Typically, a fixed model and a fixed variable combination is used in all conditions. The calibration procedure, however, makes it possible to choose the measurement combination from among many possibilities, although the model used is fixed. In this study, the usefulness of utilizing additional stand characteristics for calibrating the predicted diameter distribution is examined. Nine measurement strategies were tested in predicting the total stand volume, sawlog volume and pulpwood volume. The observed errors of these variables under each strategy were modeled as a function of basal area, basal area median diameter and number of stems. The models were estimated in three steps. First, an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) model was fitted to the observed errors. Then, a variance function was estimated using the OLS residuals. Finally, a weighted Seemingly Unrelated Regression (SUR) analysis was used to model the observed errors, using the estimated variance functions as weights. The estimated models can be used to anticipate the precision and accuracy of predicted volume characteristics for each stand with different variable combinations and, consequently, to choose the best measurement combination in different stands.

Keywords
diameter distribution; timber assortment; prediction; calibration estimation; volume; accuracy; measurement combination

Author Info
  • Kangas, University of Helsinki, Dept. of Forest Resources Management, P.O. Box 27, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail annika.kangas@helsinki.fi (email)
  • Maltamo, University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, P.O. Box 111, 80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail mm@nn.fi

Received 5 November 2001 Accepted 29 May 2002 Published 31 December 2002

Views 5510

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.522 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Maltamo M., (1997) Comparing basal area diameter distributions esti.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 1 article id 5609
Talkkari A., (1996) Regional predictions concerning the effects of c.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5592
Pukkala T., (1989) Predicting diameter growth in even-aged Scots pi.. Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 2 article id 5376
Uusitalo J., (1997) Pre-harvest measurement of pine stands for sawin.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 259 article id 7519
Miina J., Bohlin I. et al. (2021) Lessons learned from assessing the cover and yie.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10573
Bronisz K., Zasada M. (2020) Taper models for black locust in west Poland Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10351
Tuominen S., Balazs A. et al. (2020) Comparison of photogrammetric canopy models from.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10291
Malinen J., Kilpeläinen H. et al. (2018) Validating the predicted saw log and pulpwood pr.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 4 article id 9972
Nordlander G., Mason E. G. et al. (2017) Influence of climate and forest management on da.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 5 article id 7751
Ferrarese J., Affleck D. et al. (2015) Conifer crown profile models from terrestrial la.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 1 article id 1106
Siipilehto J., Mehtätalo L. (2013) Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for .. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 4 article id 1057
Mäkinen A., Kangas A. et al. (2012) Using cost-plus-loss analysis to define optimal .. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 2 article id 55
Siipilehto J., (2011) Local prediction of stand structure using linear.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 99
Pietilä I., Kangas A. et al. (2010) Influence of growth prediction errors on the exp.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 5 article id 111
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282
Siipilehto J., (2006) Linear prediction application for modelling the .. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 334
Palahí M., Pukkala T. et al. (2006) Calibrating predicted tree diameter distribution.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 332
Siipilehto J., (2006) Height distributions of Scots pine sapling stand.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 331
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002) Anticipating the variance of predicted stand vol.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 522
Nyström K., Ståhl G. (2001) Forecasting probability distributions of forest .. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 2 article id 595
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Performance of percentile based diameter distrib.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 620
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Percentile based basal area diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 619
Magnussen S., Boudewyn P. et al. (2000) Predictions of forest inventory cover type propo.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 618
Siipilehto J., (2000) A comparison of two parameter prediction methods.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 617
Kangas A. S., Kangas J. (1999) Optimization bias in forest management planning .. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 4 article id 651
Siipilehto J., (1999) Improving the accuracy of predicted basal-area d.. Silva Fennica vol. 33 no. 4 article id 650