Matti Maltamo (email)

100 years of national forest inventories

Maltamo M. (2021). 100 years of national forest inventories. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10643. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10643

Author Info
  • Maltamo, University of Eastern Finland, School of Forest Sciences, Joensuu E-mail matti.maltamo@uef.fi (email)

Received 21 September 2021 Accepted 29 September 2021 Published 29 September 2021

Views 5129

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10643 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0 full-model-article10643

National Forest Inventories (NFI) are reaching the 100 years time span. Starting from Norway in 1919 (Breidenbach et al. 2021) the establishment of the NFI followed in other counties, including Finland in 1921. Now, hundred years later, it is time to look back, the current state and the future, and celebrate. The background for the NFI was in many cases the threat of overexploitation and lack of information on the availability of timber for future harvest. During the decades many other metrics, such as forest health, biological diversity, and nowadays most noteworthy forests’ ability to absorb and store carbon, have influenced on the NFI from planning of the measurements to the calculation of the results. These changes have not only concerned the topics of the forest policy but also development in sampling frames, plot shapes and more technical aspects such as the positioning of field plots and the emergence of the role of remote sensing information, just to mention a few. It is also clear that the role of NFI will remain and even increase in the future when improved forest resource information is more and more useful for planning policies aimed at mitigating the climate change.

These days the role of forests in different carbon related calculations is frequently mentioned in the public discussion. In such conditions, the highly relevant and delightful aspect of the NFI is that is purely based on objective sampling of the forest resources. The results are calculated using established estimators with known properties. Thus, the information on forest resources is objective, it is neither based on anybody’s opinion nor the influence of any stakeholder. Changes in data collection and methods are clearly communicated. If you are, for example, interested on the frequencies of different sized trees in Finland, this information can be found from the NFI with known reliability. This is something which is nowadays often forgotten and passed in the public discussion. However, this is also something to develop; how to disseminate the knowledge about forests to politicians.

The role of NFI is not only restricted to information of forest resources for sustainable forestry and forest policy. It has offered excellent research materials and, thus, affected also scientific publishing. Earlier our publisher, The Finnish Society of Forest Science, even published NFI results. Basically, NFI is a long time series of the measurements in the forests at a very large scale. This offers numerous topics for the different disciplines of forest sciences to utilize the information. I just mention one recent paper in Silva Fennica by Siipilehto et al. (2020) where the NFI data from different Nordic countries were used to develop stand-level tree mortality models.

During my research career, I have also used NFI data for different purposes, such as comparing forest structure metrics between forest ownership groups, predicting forest age and classifying forest attributes by combining remotely sensed data and NFI field measurements. These topics would have been difficult to examine without the NFI data. I even started my career in connection with NFI: I utilized diameter distributions from the NFI plots from the whole country in my master’s thesis. In addition, during many field excursions and trainings, I have become familiar with the field routines of the NFI. The co-operation with the NFI has been very fruitful and the application of the NFI data has succeeded without any problems.

Now it is time to celebrate the 100 years of National Forest Inventories. Congratulations!

Matti Maltamo
Editor-in-Chief

References

Breidenbach J, McRoberts RE, Alberdi I, Antón-Fernández C, Tomppo E (2021) A century of national forest inventories – informing past, present and future decisions. For Ecosyst 8, article id 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-021-00315-x.

Siipilehto J, Allen M, Nilsson U, Brunner A, Huuskonen S, Haikarainen S, Subramanian N, Antón-Fernández C, Holmström E, Andreassen K, Hynynen J (2020) Stand-level mortality models for Nordic boreal forests. Silva Fenn 54, article id 10414. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10414.


Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Maltamo M., (1997) Comparing basal area diameter distributions esti.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 1 article id 5609
Uuttera J., Maltamo M. (1995) Impact of regeneration method on stand structure.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 4 article id 5562
Korhonen K. T., Maltamo M. (1991) The evaluation of forest inventory designs using.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 2 article id 5444
Kilkki P., Maltamo M. et al. (1989) Use of the Weibull function in estimating the ba.. Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 4 article id 5392
Maltamo M., (2024) “The Final Cut” Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 5 article id 24069
Maltamo M., (2024) What we pay attention to when we are in the fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 2 article id 24020
Maltamo M., (2023) What does it actually mean to measure a sample p.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005
Maltamo M., (2022) Silva Fennica has improved publishing services b.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10763
Maltamo M., (2022) The persistently developing role of remote sensi.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 1 article id 10711
Maltamo M., (2021) 100 years of national forest inventories Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10643
Maltamo M., (2020) Re-searching the forests Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 4 article id 10452
Maltamo M., (2020) Change of the Subject Editor in Silva Fennica Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 1 article id 10333
Maltamo M., (2019) Silva Fennica in 2019 Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 1 article id 10164
Jääskeläinen J., Korhonen L. et al. (2024) Individual tree inventory based on uncrewed aeri.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 3 article id 23042
Zhang S., Korhonen L. et al. (2024) How to implement the data collection of leaf are.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 5 article id 24044
Hardenbol A. A., Kuzmin A. et al. (2021) Detection of aspen in conifer-dominated boreal f.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10515
Kukkonen M., Kotivuori E. et al. (2021) Volumes by tree species can be predicted using p.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 1 article id 10360
Karjalainen T., Packalen P. et al. (2019) Predicting factual sawlog volumes in Scots pine .. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 4 article id 10183
Korhonen L., Repola J. et al. (2019) Transferability and calibration of airborne lase.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10179
Maltamo M., Hauglin M. et al. (2019) Estimating stand level stem diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10075
Maltamo M., Karjalainen T. et al. (2018) Incorporating tree- and stand-level information .. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 10006
Korhonen L., Pippuri I. et al. (2013) Detection of the need for seedling stand tending.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 2 article id 952
Villikka M., Packalén P. et al. (2012) The suitability of leaf-off airborne laser scann.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 1 article id 68
Korpela I., Ørka H. O. et al. (2010) Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 156
Suvanto A., Maltamo M. (2010) Using mixed estimation for combining airborne la.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 164
Maltamo M., Peuhkurinen J. et al. (2009) Predicting tree attributes and quality character.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 203
Peuhkurinen J., Maltamo M. et al. (2008) Estimating species-specific diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 4 article id 237
Korhonen L., Korhonen K. T. et al. (2007) Local models for forest canopy cover with beta r.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 4 article id 275
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282
Mehtätalo L., Maltamo M. et al. (2006) The use of quantile trees in the prediction of t.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 333
Hotanen J.-P., Maltamo M. et al. (2006) Canopy stratification in peatland forests in Fin.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 352
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002) Anticipating the variance of predicted stand vol.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 522
Sironen S., Kangas A. et al. (2001) Estimating individual tree growth with the k-nea.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 580
Maltamo M., Eerikäinen K. (2001) The Most Similar Neighbour reference in the yiel.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 579
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Performance of percentile based diameter distrib.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 620
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Percentile based basal area diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 619
Tahvanainen T., Kaartinen K. et al. (2007) Comparison of approaches to integrate energy woo.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 1 article id 310