Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Antti Marjokorpi (email), Jukka Salo

Operational standards and guidelines for biodiversity management in tropical and subtropical forest plantations – How widely do they cover an ecological framework?

Marjokorpi A., Salo J. (2007). Operational standards and guidelines for biodiversity management in tropical and subtropical forest plantations – How widely do they cover an ecological framework? Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 2 article id 297. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.297


The development of standards and guidelines to secure sustainable forest management at different geographical scales has expanded greatly during the past fifteen years. Most of these efforts, however, have been formulated for natural forests only; those designed specifically for forest plantations are relatively few. The global forest plantation area is expanding rapidly, with obvious positive and negative impacts on biodiversity. We characterize the key concepts of biodiversity in tropical and subtropical forest plantations and present an analysis of how these elements are covered in the eight principal operational standards and guidelines for sustainable plantation forestry. We also examine the applicability of standards and guidelines in plantations established and managed under different initial settings. The results indicate that the standards and guidelines address certain key elements of biodiversity comprehensively, meanwhile others are ignored or receive only slight attention. There is also substantial variation between the sets in their nature (performance- vs. process-based), scope, congruity in concepts and hierarchy, and specificity. The standards and guidelines seldom take into account the varying initial settings for plantation establishment and the consequent variation in critical factors in biodiversity conservation and management. We recommend that standards and guidelines should be developed so as to pay more attention to the type and operating environment of plantations, to cover all key factors of biodiversity, and to consider building closer relationships between the social and ecological aspects of biodiversity.

criteria and indicators; afforestation; conservation; sustainable forest management; reforestation

Author Info
  • Marjokorpi, Stora Enso, Wood Supply, Talvikkitie 40 C, FI-01300 Vantaa, Finland E-mail antti.marjokorpi@storaenso.com (email)
  • Salo, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20140 Turku, Finland E-mail js@nn.fi

Received 17 February 2006 Accepted 28 February 2007 Published 31 December 2007

Views 689

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.297 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Peltonen M., Heliövaara K. et al. (1997) Forest insects and environmental variation in st.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 2 article id 5613
Parviainen J., (1996) Tasks of forest biodiversity management and moni.. Silva Fennica vol. 30 no. 2–3 article id 5603
Pärnänen A., (1979) Ecological effects of different land uses and ma.. Silva Fennica vol. 13 no. 2 article id 5023
Kalela E. K., (1949) Ecological character of tree species and its rel.. Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 1 article id 7397
Miina J., Bohlin I. et al. (2021) Lessons learned from assessing the cover and yie.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10573
Kārkliņa A., Brūmelis G. et al. (2020) Effect of salvage-logging on post-fire tree esta.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10334
Nordlander G., Mason E. G. et al. (2017) Influence of climate and forest management on da.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 5 article id 7751
Mazziotta A., Podkopaev D. et al. (2017) Quantifying and resolving conservation conflicts.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 1 article id 1778
Borges P., Bergseng E. et al. (2015) Impact of maximum opening area constraints on pr.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 5 article id 1347
Akujärvi A., Hallikainen V. et al. (2014) Effects of reindeer grazing and forestry on grou.. Silva Fennica vol. 48 no. 3 article id 1153
Nordström E.-M., Holmström H. et al. (2013) Evaluating continuous cover forestry based on th.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 4 article id 1046
Rantala M., Hujala T. et al. (2012) Measuring and monitoring socio-cultural sustaina.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 3 article id 52
Stendahl J., Johansson M.-B. et al. (2010) Soil organic carbon in Swedish spruce and pine f.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 159
Veijalainen A.-M., Juntunen M.-L. et al. (2007) Forest nursery waste composting in windrows with.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 1 article id 305
Uliczka H., (2003) Nature conservation efforts by forest owners – i.. Silva Fennica vol. 37 no. 4 article id 485
Kuboyama H., Oka H. (2000) Climate risks and age-related damage probabiliti.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 2 article id 637
Lindner M., Lasch P. et al. (2000) Alternative forest management strategies under c.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 2 article id 634