Impact of regeneration method on stand structure prior to first thinning. Comparative study North Karelia, Finland vs. Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation.

Uuttera, Janne; Maltamo, Matti

Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 4 article id 5562 | 1995 | Article

Janne Uuttera , Matti Maltamo

Impact of regeneration method on stand structure prior to first thinning. Comparative study North Karelia, Finland vs. Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation.

Uuttera J., Maltamo M. (1995). Impact of regeneration method on stand structure prior to first thinning. Comparative study North Karelia, Finland vs. Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 4 article id 5562. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9213

Abstract

Comparisons were made between artificially and naturally regenerated stands in the south-eastern part of North Karelia, Finland, and naturally regenerated stands in the western parts of the Republic of Karelia, Russian Federation. The effect of soil fertility and silvicultural operations on the stand structure was also investigated.

The results of the study show clearly that when forests are artificially regenerated the stand structure includes less variation when compared with the stands naturally regenerated. Differences between the regeneration methods are clearer the more fertile the forest site is. Within the regeneration method there is also a clear trend in stand structure, with the variation decreasing the poorer the site. The effect of silvicultural operations, i.e. the cleaning of the sapling stand, has disappeared by the time of first thinning, although it appears to have a permanent effect on the dynamics of the tree species within a stand.

The variation of the stand structure can be regarded as an essential factor for the potential biodiversity of the stand also at its young vegetation succession stage. This capacity for maintaining the forest biodiversity, developed at the young vegetation succession stage, becomes increasingly important in subsequent vegetation succession stages. Natural regeneration provides improved possibilities for the operations preserving forest biodiversity, as it generates more dense stands with a wider variation in stand structure, compared to artificial regeneration.

Keywords
natural regeneration; stand structure; artificial regeneration; potential biodiversity; regeneration strategy

Published in 1995

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.a9213 | Download PDF

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Contents alert

Export reference to EndNote / RefWorks

Your selected articles

Your search results

Maltamo M., (1997) Comparing basal area diameter distributions esti.. Silva Fennica vol. 31 no. 1 article id 5609

Uuttera J., Maltamo M. (1995) Impact of regeneration method on stand structure.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 4 article id 5562

Korhonen K. T., Maltamo M. (1991) The evaluation of forest inventory designs using.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 2 article id 5444

Kilkki P., Maltamo M. et al. (1989) Use of the Weibull function in estimating the ba.. Silva Fennica vol. 23 no. 4 article id 5392

Maltamo M., (2024) “The Final Cut” Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 5 article id 24069

Maltamo M., (2024) What we pay attention to when we are in the fore.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 2 article id 24020

Maltamo M., (2023) What does it actually mean to measure a sample p.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 4 article id 23005

Maltamo M., (2022) Silva Fennica has improved publishing services b.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 2 article id 10763

Maltamo M., (2022) The persistently developing role of remote sensi.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 1 article id 10711

Maltamo M., (2021) 100 years of national forest inventories Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10643

Maltamo M., (2020) Re-searching the forests Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 4 article id 10452

Maltamo M., (2020) Change of the Subject Editor in Silva Fennica Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 1 article id 10333

Maltamo M., (2019) Silva Fennica in 2019 Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 1 article id 10164

Jääskeläinen J., Korhonen L. et al. (2024) Individual tree inventory based on uncrewed aeri.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 3 article id 23042

Zhang S., Korhonen L. et al. (2024) How to implement the data collection of leaf are.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 5 article id 24044

Hardenbol A. A., Kuzmin A. et al. (2021) Detection of aspen in conifer-dominated boreal f.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 4 article id 10515

Kukkonen M., Kotivuori E. et al. (2021) Volumes by tree species can be predicted using p.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 1 article id 10360

Karjalainen T., Packalen P. et al. (2019) Predicting factual sawlog volumes in Scots pine .. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 4 article id 10183

Korhonen L., Repola J. et al. (2019) Transferability and calibration of airborne lase.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10179

Maltamo M., Hauglin M. et al. (2019) Estimating stand level stem diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 3 article id 10075

Maltamo M., Karjalainen T. et al. (2018) Incorporating tree- and stand-level information .. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 10006

Korhonen L., Pippuri I. et al. (2013) Detection of the need for seedling stand tending.. Silva Fennica vol. 47 no. 2 article id 952

Villikka M., Packalén P. et al. (2012) The suitability of leaf-off airborne laser scann.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 1 article id 68

Korpela I., Ørka H. O. et al. (2010) Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 156

Suvanto A., Maltamo M. (2010) Using mixed estimation for combining airborne la.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 1 article id 164

Maltamo M., Peuhkurinen J. et al. (2009) Predicting tree attributes and quality character.. Silva Fennica vol. 43 no. 3 article id 203

Peuhkurinen J., Maltamo M. et al. (2008) Estimating species-specific diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 4 article id 237

Korhonen L., Korhonen K. T. et al. (2007) Local models for forest canopy cover with beta r.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 4 article id 275

Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282

Mehtätalo L., Maltamo M. et al. (2006) The use of quantile trees in the prediction of t.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 333

Hotanen J.-P., Maltamo M. et al. (2006) Canopy stratification in peatland forests in Fin.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 1 article id 352

Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002) Anticipating the variance of predicted stand vol.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 522

Sironen S., Kangas A. et al. (2001) Estimating individual tree growth with the k-nea.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 580

Maltamo M., Eerikäinen K. (2001) The Most Similar Neighbour reference in the yiel.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 579

Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Performance of percentile based diameter distrib.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 620

Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Percentile based basal area diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 619

Tahvanainen T., Kaartinen K. et al. (2007) Comparison of approaches to integrate energy woo.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 1 article id 310