Full text of this article is only available in PDF format.

Minna Räty (email), Annika Kangas

Segmentation of model localization sub-areas by Getis statistics

Räty M., Kangas A. (2010). Segmentation of model localization sub-areas by Getis statistics. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 155. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.155

Abstract

Models for large areas (global models) are often biased in smaller sub-areas, even when the model is unbiased for the whole area. Localization of the global model removes the local bias, but the problem is to find homogenous sub-areas in which to localize the function. In this study, we used the eCognition Professional 4.0 (later versions called Definies Pro) segmentation process to segment the study area into homogeneous sub-areas with respect to residuals of the global model of the form height and/or local Getis statistics calculated for the residuals, i.e., Gi*-indices. The segmentation resulted in four different rasters: 1) residuals of the global model, 2) the local Gi*-index, and 3) residuals and the local Gi*-index weighted by the inverse of the variance, and 4) without weighting. The global model was then localized (re-fitted) for these sub-areas. The number of resulting sub-areas varied from 4 to 366. On average, the root mean squared errors (RMSEs) were 3.6% lower after localization than the global model RMSEs in sub-areas before localization. However, the localization actually increased the RMSE in some sub-areas, indicating the sub-area were not appropriate for local fitting. For 56% of the sub-areas, coordinates and distance from coastline were not statistically significant variables, in other words these areas were spatially homogenous. To compare the segmentations, we calculated an aggregate standard error of the RMSEs of the single sub-areas in the segmentation. The segmentations in which the local index was present had slightly lower standard errors than segmentations based on residuals.

Keywords
eCognition; form height; Getis statistics; image segmentation; local indicators of spatial association

Author Info
  • Räty, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 27 (Latokartanonkaari 7), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail minna.s.raty@helsinki.fi (email)
  • Kangas, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences, P.O. Box 27 (Latokartanonkaari 7), FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland E-mail ak@nn.fi

Received 17 August 2009 Accepted 31 March 2010 Published 31 December 2010

Views 3357

Available at https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.155 | Download PDF

Creative Commons License CC BY-SA 4.0

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Your search results
Kangas A., Korhonen K. T. (1995) Generalizing sample tree information with semipa.. Silva Fennica vol. 29 no. 2 article id 5553
Kangas A., (1994) Classical and model based estimators for forest .. Silva Fennica vol. 28 no. 1 article id 5524
Kangas A., (1991) Updated measurement data as prior information in.. Silva Fennica vol. 25 no. 3 article id 5453
Eyvindson K., Kangas A. et al. (2024) Integrating wind disturbances into forest planni.. Silva Fennica vol. 58 no. 4 article id 23044
Stenman V., Kangas A. et al. (2023) Upper stem diameter and volume prediction strate.. Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 3 article id 23021
Kangas A., Myllymäki M. et al. (2023) Understanding uncertainty in forest resources maps Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 2 article id 22026
Tuominen S., Balazs A. et al. (2020) Comparison of photogrammetric canopy models from.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 5 article id 10291
Katila M., Rajala T. et al. (2020) Assessing local trends in indicators of ecosyste.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 4 article id 10347
Kangas A., Henttonen H. M. et al. (2020) Re-calibrating stem volume models – is there cha.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 4 article id 10269
Haara A., Kangas A. et al. (2019) Economic losses caused by tree species proportio.. Silva Fennica vol. 53 no. 2 article id 10089
Kangas A., Gobakken T. et al. (2018) Value of airborne laser scanning and digital aer.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 1 article id 9923
Tuominen S., Pitkänen T. et al. (2017) Improving Finnish Multi-Source National Forest I.. Silva Fennica vol. 51 no. 4 article id 7743
Korpela I., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2014) Tree species identification in aerial image data.. Silva Fennica vol. 48 no. 3 article id 1087
Mäkinen A., Kangas A. et al. (2012) Using cost-plus-loss analysis to define optimal .. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 2 article id 55
Wallenius T., Laamanen R. et al. (2012) Analysing the agreement between an Airborne Lase.. Silva Fennica vol. 46 no. 1 article id 69
Laamanen R., Kangas A. (2011) Large-scale forest owner’s information needs in .. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 101
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2011) Sensitivity of harvest decisions to errors in st.. Silva Fennica vol. 45 no. 4 article id 100
Pietilä I., Kangas A. et al. (2010) Influence of growth prediction errors on the exp.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 5 article id 111
Räty M., Kangas A. (2010) Segmentation of model localization sub-areas by .. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 155
Kangas A., Haapakoski R. et al. (2008) Integrating place-specific social values into fo.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 5 article id 467
Kangas A., Mehtätalo L. et al. (2007) Modelling percentile based basal area weighted d.. Silva Fennica vol. 41 no. 3 article id 282
Mehtätalo L., Maltamo M. et al. (2006) The use of quantile trees in the prediction of t.. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 3 article id 333
Laukkanen S., Palander T. et al. (2005) Evaluation of the multicriteria approval method .. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 2 article id 387
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2002) Anticipating the variance of predicted stand vol.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 4 article id 522
Sironen S., Kangas A. et al. (2001) Estimating individual tree growth with the k-nea.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 4 article id 580
Kangas A., Kangas J. et al. (2001) Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural.. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 2 article id 597
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Performance of percentile based diameter distrib.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 620
Kangas A., Maltamo M. (2000) Percentile based basal area diameter distributio.. Silva Fennica vol. 34 no. 4 article id 619
Saarinen N., White J. C. et al. (2018) Landsat archive holdings for Finland: opportunit.. Silva Fennica vol. 52 no. 3 article id 9986
Kangas A., Hujala T. (2015) Challenges in publishing: producing, assuring an.. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 4 article id 1304