Lauri Korhonen, Kari T. Korhonen, Miina Rautiainen, Pauline Stenberg. (2006). Estimation of forest canopy cover: a comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fennica vol. 40 no. 4 article id 315. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.315

Keywords: canopy cover; forest canopy; canopy closure; Cajanus tube; line intersect sampling; spherical densiometer; digital photographs

Abstract | View details | Full text in PDF | Author Info

Estimation of forest canopy cover has recently been included in many forest inventory programmes. In this study, after discussing how canopy cover is defined, different ground-based canopy cover estimation techniques are compared to determine which would be the most feasible for a large scale forest inventory. Canopy cover was estimated in 19 Scots pine or Norway spruce dominated plots using the Cajanus tube, line intersect sampling, modified spherical densiometer, digital photographs, and ocular estimation. The comparisons were based on the differences in values acquired with selected techniques and control values acquired with the Cajanus tube. The statistical significance of the differences between the techniques was tested with the nonparametric Kruskall-Wallis analysis of variance and multiple comparisons. The results indicate that different techniques yield considerably different canopy cover estimates. In general, labour intensive techniques (the Cajanus tube, line intersect sampling) provide unbiased and more precise estimates, whereas the estimates provided by fast techniques (digital photographs, ocular estimation) have larger variances and may also be seriously biased.

Korhonen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: lauri.korhonen@joensuu.fi
Korhonen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: ktk@nn.fi
Rautiainen, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: mr@nn.fi
Stenberg, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 68, FI-68101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: ps@nn.fi

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Contents alert

Your selected articles
Send to email

Eräjää S., Halme P. et al. (2010) The volume and composition of dead wood on tradi.. Silva Fennica vol. 44 no. 2 article id 150 (remove) | Edit comment

Givnish T. J., (2002) Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous.. Silva Fennica vol. 36 no. 3 article id 535 (remove) | Edit comment

Vuori E., (1913) Coniferous tree stands of the state forest “Vesi.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 2 no. 1 article id 7528 (remove) | Edit comment

Huang W., (1998) Productive coexistence and gain in agroforestry .. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 260 article id 7520 (remove) | Edit comment

Hildén N. A., (1934) Observations on forestry in private farms in Fin.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 40 no. 33 article id 7310 (remove) | Edit comment

Laitakari E., (1935) Activities of Finnish Society of Forest Sciences.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 42 no. 1 article id 7318 (remove) | Edit comment

Meurman O., (1963) Notes on ornamental trees and shrubs at the Depa.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 76 no. 3 article id 7143 (remove) | Edit comment

Kangas A., Myllymäki M. et al. (2023) Understanding uncertainty in forest resources maps Silva Fennica vol. 57 no. 2 article id 22026 (remove) | Edit comment

Lee D., Siipilehto J. et al. (2021) Models for diameter distribution and tree height.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 5 article id 10612 (remove) | Edit comment

Follow @SilvaFennica