Silva Fennica vol. 59 no. 2 | 2025

Evaluating the potential of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system in monitoring biodiversity indicators such as low vegetation during forest harvesting could enhance sustainable forest management and habitat conservation including dense forest areas for game. However, there is a lack of understanding on the capabilities and limitations of these systems to detect low vegetation characteristics. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated the performance of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system for measuring low vegetation (height <5 m) attributes in a boreal forest in Finland, by comparing it with handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS) and drone laser scanning (DLS) systems. LiDAR point cloud data was collected in September 2023 to quantify the low vegetation height (maximum, mean, and percentiles), volume (voxel-based and mean height-based) and cover (grid method). Depending on the system, LiDAR point cloud data was collected either before (HMLS and DLS), during (harvester LiDAR) or after (HMLS and DLS) harvesting operations. A total of 46 fixed-sized (5 m × 5 m) grid cells were studied and analyzed. Results showed harvester-mounted LiDAR provided consistent estimates with HMLS and DLS for maximum height, 99th height percentile, and volume across various grids (5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm) and voxel (20 cm) sizes. High correlation was observed between the systems used for these attributes. This study demonstrated that harvester-mounted LiDAR is comparable to HMLS and DLS for assessing low vegetation height and volume. The findings could assist forest harvester operators in identifying potential low vegetation and dense areas for conservation and game management.

• Kafle, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-3480 E-mail: binod.kafle@uef.fi
• Kankare, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-1579 E-mail: viveka@utu.fi
• Kaartinen, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-3942 E-mail: harri.kaartinen@nls.fi
• Väätäinen, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6 B, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-0432 E-mail: kari.vaatainen@luke.fi
• Hyyti, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-6221 E-mail: heikki.hyyti@nls.fi
• Faitli, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-5537 E-mail: tamas.faitli@nls.fi
• Hyyppä, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland E-mail: juha.coelasr@gmail.com
• Kukko, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-6533 E-mail: antero.kukko@nls.fi
• Kärhä, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: kalle.karha@uef.fi

Accurate field plot data on forest attributes are crucial in area-based forest inventories assisted by airborne laser scanning, providing an essential reference for calibrating predictive models. This study assessed how sample tree selection methods and plot data calculation methods affect the accuracy of field plot values of timber volume, Lorey’s mean height, and dominant height. We used data obtained from 12 420 circular sample plots of 250 m², measured as part of the Norwegian national forest inventory and 45 local forest management inventories. We applied Monte Carlo simulations by which we tested various numbers of sample trees, methods to select sample trees, and methods to calculate plot-level values from tree-level measurements. Accuracies of plot values were statistically significantly affected by the number of sample trees, sample tree selection method, and calculation method. Obtained values of root mean square error ranged from 5% to 16% relative to the mean observed values, across the factors studied. Accuracy improved with increasing numbers of sample trees for all forest attributes. We obtained greatest accuracies by selecting sample trees with a probability proportional to basal area, and by retaining field-measured heights for sample trees and using heights predicted with a height-diameter model for non-sample trees. This study highlights the importance of appropriate sample tree selection methods and calculation methods in obtaining accurate field plot data in area-based forest inventories.

• Noordermeer, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-0345 E-mail: lennart.noordermeer@nmbu.no
• Gobakken, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-049X E-mail: terje.gobakken@nmbu.no
• Breidenbach, Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway E-mail: johannes.breidenbach@nibio.no
• Eriksen, Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway E-mail: rune.eriksen@nibio.no
• Næsset, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway E-mail: erik.naesset@nmbu.no
• Ørka, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway E-mail: hans-ole.orka@nmbu.no
• Bollandsås, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-7692 E-mail: ole.martin.bollandsas@nmbu.no

Fine-scale, spatially explicit forest attribute maps are essential for guiding forest management and policy decisions. Such maps, based on the combination of National Forest Inventory (NFI) and remote sensing datasets, have a long tradition in the Nordic countries. Harmonizing the pixel size among national forest attribute maps would considerably improve the utility of the maps for users. However, the maps are often aligned with the NFI plot size, and the influence of creating these maps at different spatial resolutions (i.e. pixel sizes) is little studied. We assess the stand-level uncertainty (RMSE) of biomass, volume, basal area, and Lorey’s height estimates resulting from the aggregation of maps across varying spatial resolutions. Models fit at 16 m native resolution using more than 14 000 NFI plots were applied for predictions at pixels sizes (side lengths) of 1, 5, 10, 16, and 30 m. For independent validation, we used more than 600 field plots – that cover a total area of 24 ha and were clustered within 65 stands across Norway. For all attributes, the lowest RMSEs, ranging from 6.86% for Lorey’s height to 13.86% for volume, were observed for predictions at pixel sizes of 5 m to 16 m. The RMSE changes across resolutions were generally small (< 5%) for biomass, volume, and basal area. For Lorey’s height, changing the spatial resolution resulted in large RMSEs of up to 25%. Overall, our findings suggest that the main forest attributes can be mapped at a finer resolutions without complex adjustments.

• Koma, Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Department National Forest Inventory, Høgskoleveien 7, 1433 Ås, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-8258 E-mail: zsofia.koma@nibio.no
• Breidenbach, Norwegian Institute for Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Department National Forest Inventory, Høgskoleveien 7, 1433 Ås, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3137-7236 E-mail: johannes.breidenbach@nibio.no

This paper examines forest resource mapping from a statistical perspective, highlighting the opportunity to use a design-based approach to ensure inferential congruency with the estimation of averages and totals of forest attributes. Traditionally, in forest surveys estimates of averages and totals are obtained using design-unbiased estimators, with known variance expressions that can be easily estimated using standard sampling methodologies. The paper emphasizes the prominent role of kNN and Random Forest techniques in forest mapping while addressing the methodological limitations identified over more than thirty years of forest literature in efforts to estimate map precision. The critical importance of design-based map consistency, often overlooked in forest literature, is discussed and clarified, demonstrating that it allows for the development of design-based estimators of map precision through bootstrap resampling from the estimated maps.

• Franceschi, Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Siena, Via Banchi di Sotto 55, 53100 Siena, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-4540 E-mail: franceschi2@unisi.it
• Pisani, Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Siena, Via Banchi di Sotto 55, 53100 Siena, Italy E-mail: caterin.pisani@unisi.it
• Fattorini, Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Siena, Via Banchi di Sotto 55, 53100 Siena, Italy E-mail: lorenzo.fattorini@unisi.it
• Corona, CREA, Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, Viale Santa Margherita 80, 52100 Arezzo, Italy E-mail: piermaria.corona@crea.gov.it

Climate change is intensifying fire regimes in boreal forests, leading to ecological disruption and raising concerns about forest resilience and post-disturbance recovery. Altered fire dynamics creates novel opportunities for implementing adaptive silviculture for climate change, including assisted migration, the intentional movement and establishment of tree species or tree populations outside their current range of distribution to better match anticipated future climates. Here, we examine how the increasing frequency, severity, and spatial extent of Canadian boreal wildfires can serve as strategic windows for introducing climate-resilient tree species and genotypes. We review how fire influences the availability and suitability of post-fire sites for assisted migration, highlighting how fire-induced changes in soil abiotic and biotic properties may facilitate or hinder the establishment of relocated tree species. While fire can simplify site preparation, reduce biotic competition, and temporarily enhance soil nutrient availability, it may also degrade soil structure by consuming or altering soil organic matter and increasing soil susceptibility to erosion and disrupt essential mycorrhizal associations. We argue that assisted migration of tree species can be a proactive silvicultural tool when used in areas with regeneration failure or where future climate conditions are likely to exceed the tolerance limits of native species. Whilst scientific evidence remains limited on the regeneration success of migrated species and genotypes in post-fire environments, we argue for an integrated adaptation strategy that combines natural regeneration with targeted assisted migration interventions, guided by local site conditions, genetic considerations, and policy support, to build resilient boreal forests under changing disturbance regimes.

• Lebel Desrosiers, Laboratoire sur la science des données, Université du Québec (TÉLUQ), 5800, rue Saint-Denis, bureau 1105, Montréal, Québec H2S 3L5, Canada https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1592-8505 E-mail: simon.lebeldesrosiers@teluq.ca
• Bélanger, Laboratoire sur la science des données, Université du Québec (TÉLUQ), 5800, rue Saint-Denis, bureau 1105, Montréal, Québec H2S 3L5, Canada E-mail: nicolas.belanger@teluq.ca
• Thiffault, Centre de recherche sur les matériaux renouvelables, Université Laval, 2425 De la Terrasse St, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-3834 E-mail: evelyne.thiffault@sbf.ulaval.ca
• Thiffault, Service canadien des forêts, Ressources naturelles Canada, 1055, rue Du P.E.P.S., C.P. 10380, Québec, Québec G1V 4C7, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2017-6890 E-mail: nelson.thiffault@canada.ca