article id 25003,
category
Research article
Highlights:
Retaining field-measured heights of sample trees improved accuracies of plot values; Selecting sample trees with probability proportional to basal area was recommended; The number of sample trees and sample tree selection method impacted accuracies; The choice of calculation method had a strong influence on accuracies of plot values.
Abstract |
Full text in HTML
|
Full text in PDF |
Author Info
Accurate field plot data on forest attributes are crucial in area-based forest inventories assisted by airborne laser scanning, providing an essential reference for calibrating predictive models. This study assessed how sample tree selection methods and plot data calculation methods affect the accuracy of field plot values of timber volume, Lorey’s mean height, and dominant height. We used data obtained from 12 420 circular sample plots of 250 m2, measured as part of the Norwegian national forest inventory and 45 local forest management inventories. We applied Monte Carlo simulations by which we tested various numbers of sample trees, methods to select sample trees, and methods to calculate plot-level values from tree-level measurements. Accuracies of plot values were statistically significantly affected by the number of sample trees, sample tree selection method, and calculation method. Obtained values of root mean square error ranged from 5% to 16% relative to the mean observed values, across the factors studied. Accuracy improved with increasing numbers of sample trees for all forest attributes. We obtained greatest accuracies by selecting sample trees with a probability proportional to basal area, and by retaining field-measured heights for sample trees and using heights predicted with a height-diameter model for non-sample trees. This study highlights the importance of appropriate sample tree selection methods and calculation methods in obtaining accurate field plot data in area-based forest inventories.
-
Noordermeer,
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8840-0345
E-mail:
lennart.noordermeer@nmbu.no
-
Gobakken,
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-049X
E-mail:
terje.gobakken@nmbu.no
-
Breidenbach,
Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
E-mail:
johannes.breidenbach@nibio.no
-
Eriksen,
Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
E-mail:
rune.eriksen@nibio.no
-
Næsset,
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
E-mail:
erik.naesset@nmbu.no
-
Ørka,
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
E-mail:
hans-ole.orka@nmbu.no
-
Bollandsås,
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NMBU, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-7692
E-mail:
ole.martin.bollandsas@nmbu.no