article id 23042,
category
Climate resilient and sustainable forest management – Research article
Highlights:
A practical scheme to improve the accuracy of predicted tree and stand attributes in an uncrewed aerial vehicle based individual tree inventory; Accuracy was considerably improved with data from 2–4 sample trees from the target stand; Calibrated existing models and the construction of local models performed equally well; The laborious task of constructing a local model can be avoided by using a calibrated transferred model.
Abstract |
Full text in HTML
|
Full text in PDF |
Author Info
Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) have great potential for use in forest inventories, but in practice they can be expensive for relatively small inventory areas as a large number of field measurements are needed for model construction. One proposed solution is to transfer previously constructed models to a new inventory area and to calibrate these with a small number of local field measurements. Our objective was to compare calibration of general models and the construction of new models to determine the best approach for UAV-based forest inventories. Our material included field measurements and UAV-based laser scanning data, from which individual trees were automatically identified. A general mixed-effects model for diameter at breast height (DBH) had been formulated earlier based on data from a geographically wider area. It was calibrated to the study area with field measurements from 2–10 randomly selected calibration trees. The calibrated diameters were used to calculate the diameter of a basal area median tree (DGM), tree volumes, and the volume of all trees at plot-level. Next, new DBH-models were formulated based on the 2–10 randomly selected trees and calibrated with plot-level random effects estimated during model construction. Finally, plot-specific height-diameter regression models were formulated by randomly selecting 10 trees from each plot. Calibration reduced the prediction errors of all variables. An increase in the number of calibration trees decreased error rates by 1–6% depending on the variable. Calibrated predictions from the general mixed-effects model were similar to the separately formulated mixed-effects models and plot-specific regression models.
-
Jääskeläinen,
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4127-7863
E-mail:
johanna.jaaskelainen@uef.fi
-
Korhonen,
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-0114
E-mail:
lauri.korhonen@uef.fi
-
Kukkonen,
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Yliopistokatu 6 B, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4206-1680
E-mail:
mikko.kukkonen@luke.fi
-
Packalen,
Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1804-0011
E-mail:
petteri.packalen@luke.fi
-
Maltamo,
School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9904-3371
E-mail:
matti.maltamo@uef.fi