Jorge Cancino, Joachim Saborowski. (2005). Comparison of randomized branch sampling with and without replacement at the first stage. Silva Fennica vol. 39 no. 2 article id 384. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.384

Keywords: Randomized Branch Sampling; sampling without replacement; probability proportional to size; unequal selection probabilities; multistage sampling

Abstract | View details | Full text in PDF | Author Info

Randomized Branch Sampling (RBS) is a multistage sampling procedure using natural branching in order to select samples for the estimation of tree characteristics. Usually, sampling units are selected with unequal probabilities. Conventional RBS uses sampling with replacement (SWR) for repeated sampling on the first stage, and the sample size equals 1 on all subsequent stages, thus resulting in n so-called sample paths. When the sampling fraction is large multiple selections of first stage units are likely. Sampling without replacement (SWOR) at the first stage is an alternative that is expected to increase efficiency of the procedure. In this case, the second stage sample size m must be larger than 1 to enable unbiased variance estimation. In the present study, a theoretical and an empirical comparison of the conventional RBS and the SWOR variant was accomplished. Requiring a certain precision of the RBS estimation, the conventional RBS method is mostly more time-consuming than the variant with SWOR at the first stage. Only if m = 1 is chosen as second stage sample size for the SWOR RBS, this is often more time-consuming. In those cases, conventional RBS is up to 5% cheaper. In general, the larger m is, the more expensive is conventional RBS compared with the variant with swor at the first stage. The smaller the ratio of the variance between the primary units to the total variance of the estimate, the larger is the advantage of the SWOR variant. Generally, it can be shown that the gain of efficiency by SWOR is larger in case of weak correlations between auxiliary and target variable.

Cancino, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Chile E-mail: jcancino@udec.cl
Saborowski, Institut für Forstliche Biometrie und Informatik, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany E-mail: js@nn.de

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Contents alert

Your selected articles
Send to email

Chung M.-S., (1981) Biochemical methods for determining population s.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 173 article id 7620 (remove) | Edit comment

Nyyssönen A., Ojansuu R. (1982) Assessment of timber assortments, value and valu.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 179 article id 7626 (remove) | Edit comment

Suoheimo J., (1984) The occurrence of Otiorrhynchus nodosus and its .. Silva Fennica vol. 18 no. 3 article id 5218 (remove) | Edit comment

Lehtonen I., Kellomäki S. et al. (1976) Nutrient cycle in a Scots pine stand I. Seasonal.. Silva Fennica vol. 10 no. 3 article id 4946 (remove) | Edit comment

Sarasto J., (1960) Determining decomposition decree of peat with vo.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 71 no. 2 article id 7111 (remove) | Edit comment

Katjutin P. N., Stavrova N. I. et al. (2020) Radial growth of trees differing in their vitali.. Silva Fennica vol. 54 no. 3 article id 10263 (remove) | Edit comment

Rogers M. T., (1957) Ring-shadows Silva Fennica vol. no. 93 article id 4673 (remove) | Edit comment

Camilo-Alves C., Nunes J. A. et al. (2022) Influence of water and nutrients on cork oak rad.. Silva Fennica vol. 56 no. 3 article id 10698 (remove) | Edit comment

Ojansuu R., (1993) Prediction of Scots pine increment using a multi.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 0 no. 239 article id 7685 (remove) | Edit comment

Follow @SilvaFennica