Current issue: 60(3)

Under compilation: 60(4)

Scopus CiteScore 2023: 3.5
Scopus ranking of open access forestry journals: 17^th
PlanS compliant

Most viewed articles

Instructions for reviewers
Instructions for authors
Metadata instructions
Submit an article

Select issue

Volume 60 (2026)

Volume 59 (2025)

Volume 58 (2024)

Volume 57 (2023)

Volume 56 (2022)

Volume 55 (2021)

Volume 54 (2020)

Volume 53 (2019)

Volume 52 (2018)

Volume 51 (2017)

Volume 50 (2016)

Volume 49 (2015)

Volume 48 (2014)

Volume 47 (2013)

Volume 46 (2012)

Volume 45 (2011)

Volume 44 (2010)

Volume 43 (2009)

Volume 42 (2008)

Volume 41 (2007)

Volume 40 (2006)

Volume 39 (2005)

Volume 38 (2004)

Volume 37 (2003)

Volume 36 (2002)

Volume 35 (2001)

Volume 34 (2000)

Volume 33 (1999)

Volume 32 (1998)

Silva Fennica Monographs 2000-2005

Silva Fennica 1926-1997

1990-1997

Volume 31 (1997)

Volume 30 (1996)

Volume 29 (1995)

Volume 28 (1994)

Volume 27 (1993)

Volume 26 (1992)

Volume 25 (1991)

Volume 24 (1990)

1980-1989

Volume 23 (1989)

Volume 22 (1988)

Volume 21 (1987)

Volume 20 (1986)

Volume 19 (1985)

Volume 18 (1984)

Volume 17 (1983)

Volume 16 (1982)

Volume 15 (1981)

Volume 14 (1980)

1970-1979

Volume 13 (1979)

Volume 12 (1978)

Volume 11 (1977)

Volume 10 (1976)

Volume 9 (1975)

Volume 8 (1974)

Volume 7 (1973)

Volume 6 (1972)

Volume 5 (1971)

Volume 4 (1970)

1960-1969

Volume 3 (1969)

Volume 2 (1968)

Volume 1 (1967)

1960-1966

1950-1959

1940-1949

1926-1939

Acta Forestalia Fennica

1992-1999

1984-1991

1974-1983

1968-1973

1953-1968

Volume 84 (1967)

Volume 83 (1967)

Volume 82 (1967)

Volume 81 (1966)

Volume 80 (1965)

Volume 79 (1965)

Volume 78 (1964)

Volume 77 (1964)

Volume 76 (1963)

Volume 75 (1961)

Volume 74 (1961)

Volume 73 (1960)

Volume 72 (1959)

Volume 71 (1959)

Volume 70 (1959)

Volume 69 (1959)

Volume 68 (1958)

Volume 67 (1958)

Volume 66 (1956)

Volume 65 (1955)

Volume 64 (1955)

Volume 63 (1954)

Volume 62 (1954)

Volume 61 (1954)

Volume 60 (1953)

1933-1952

Volume 59 (1950)

Volume 58 (1950)

Volume 57 (1949)

Volume 56 (1949)

Volume 55 (1947)

Volume 54 (1946)

Volume 53 (1945)

Volume 52 (1946)

Volume 51 (1942)

Volume 50 (1940)

Volume 49 (1940)

Volume 48 (1939)

Volume 47 (1938)

Volume 46 (1937)

Volume 45 (1936)

Volume 44 (1936)

Volume 43 (1934)

Volume 42 (1935)

Volume 41 (1934)

Volume 40 (1934)

Volume 39 (1933)

1913-1932

Volume 38 (1932)

Volume 37 (1931)

Volume 36 (1929)

Volume 35 (1929)

Volume 34 (1929)

Volume 33 (1927)

Volume 32 (1926)

Volume 31 (1926)

Volume 30 (1925)

Volume 29 (1925)

Volume 28 (1926)

Volume 27 (1923)

Volume 26 (1923)

Volume 25 (1923)

Volume 24 (1922)

Volume 23 (1923)

Volume 22 (1922)

Volume 21 (1921)

Volume 20 (1921)

Volume 19 (1921)

Volume 18 (1921)

Volume 17 (1920)

Volume 16 (1920)

Volume 15 (1920)

Volume 14 (1920)

Volume 13 (1919)

Volume 12 (1919)

Volume 11 (1919)

Volume 10 (1919)

Volume 9 (1919)

Volume 8 (1917)

Volume 7 (1917)

Volume 6 (1916)

Volume 5 (1915)

Volume 4 (1915)

Volume 3 (1914)

Volume 2 (1913)

Volume 1 (1913)

Articles by Anneli Jalkanen

Category : Research article

article id 593, category Research article

Anneli Jalkanen. (2001). The probability of moose damage at the stand level in southern Finland. Silva Fennica vol. 35 no. 2 article id 593. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.593

Keywords: National Forest Inventory; Alces alces; multilevel logistic regression; risk management

Abstract | View details | Full text in PDF | Author Info

The probability of moose damage was studied in sapling stands and young thinning stands in southern Finland. Data from the eighth National Forest Inventory in 1986–92 were used for modelling. The frequency of damage was highest at the height of two to five meters and at the age of ten to twenty years (at the time of measurement). Moose preferred aspen stands the most and least preferred Norway spruce stands. Scots pine and silver birch were also susceptible to damage. Logistic regression models were developed for predicting the probability that moose damage is the most important damaging agent in a forest stand. The best predictive variables were the age and dominant species of the stand. Variables describing the site were significant as cluster averages, possibly characterizing the area as a food source (fertility and organic soil), as well as the lack of shelter (wall stand). When sample plot, cluster and municipality levels were compared, it was found that most of the unexplained variance was at the cluster level. To improve the model, more information should be obtained from that level. The regression coefficients for aspen as supplementary species, and for pine as dominant species, had significant variance from cluster to cluster (area to area). It was also shown that the occurrence of aspen is closely connected to the occurrence of moose damage in pine sapling stands.

Jalkanen, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Unioninkatu 40 A, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland E-mail: anneli.jalkanen@metla.fi

Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.

If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.

Sign up to receive alerts of new content

Your selected articles
Send to email

Heske F., (1929) Paper on knowledge on forest zones in West-Himal.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 34 no. 30 article id 7243 (remove) | Edit comment

Walldén P., (1933) Bending strength of birch wood Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 39 no. 5 article id 7276 (remove) | Edit comment

Auer V., (1920) The development of the hummock ridges on the pea.. Acta Forestalia Fennica vol. 12 no. 2 article id 7029 (remove) | Edit comment

Bartels S. F., (2021) The deciduous confusion: it is time to get the c.. Silva Fennica vol. 55 no. 3 article id 10604 (remove) | Edit comment

Laurén A., (2026) For heavy-duty use Silva Fennica vol. 59 no. 3 article id 26003 (remove) | Edit comment

Steinke L. R., Premoli A. C. et al. (2008) Adaptive and neutral variation of the resprouter.. Silva Fennica vol. 42 no. 2 article id 251 (remove) | Edit comment

Follow @SilvaFennica