Current issue: 60(3)

Scopus CiteScore 2023: 3.5
Scopus ranking of open access forestry journals: 17th
PlanS compliant
Select issue
Silva Fennica 1926-1997
1990-1997
1980-1989
1970-1979
1960-1969
Acta Forestalia Fennica
1953-1968
1933-1952
1913-1932

Articles by Harri Kaartinen

Category : Research article

article id 25056, category Research article
Binod Kafle, Ville Kankare, Harri Kaartinen, Kari Väätäinen, Heikki Hyyti, Tamas Faitli, Niko Koivumäki, Juha Hyyppä, Antero Kukko, Kalle Kärhä. (2026). Boreal forest structure assessment using harvester-mounted, drone-based and backpack mobile laser scanning systems​​. Silva Fennica vol. 60 no. 3 article id 25056. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25056
Keywords: wood harvesting; voxel; point cloud; complexity; forest machine
Highlights: Harvester-mounted mobile laser scanning (HarvMLS) provides estimates of canopy height, canopy cover, and structural variability comparable to drone-based laser scanning (DLS) and backpack mobile laser scanning (BpMLS); HarvMLS provides filled voxel proportion estimates comparable to BpMLS.
Abstract | Full text in HTML | Full text in PDF | Author Info

Harvester-mounted mobile laser scanning (HarvMLS) is a novel approach to quantify forest structure in situ during harvesting operations. However, its reliability relative to established aerial and ground-based laser scanning systems remains unknown. In this study, we benchmarked HarvMLS against drone-based laser scanning (DLS) and backpack mobile laser scanning (BpMLS) for forest structure assessment. Point cloud data were acquired using these laser scanning systems in a boreal forest in southern Finland during thinning operations in 2024. HarvMLS collected data during thinning, while BpMLS and DLS collected data immediately before and after thinning. A grid-level approach was used for point cloud processing. Sixty-two 10 m × 10 m plots were analyzed, each with pre- and post-thinning data. Forest structure was characterised using estimates of structural attributes and complexity. The structural attributes included canopy height, canopy cover (CC), and filled voxel proportion (FVP). Structural complexity was quantified using the coefficient of variation (CV) of the structural attributes. Furthermore, FVP was analyzed across various canopy height classes to evaluate the scanning system’s capacity to capture vegetation density at different canopy layers. The scanning systems consistently estimated canopy height, CC, and the CV of these attributes, including the CV of FVP. Significant differences were detected for FVP and FVP at lower canopy layers (<15 m). However, post hoc tests showed no significant difference between HarvMLS and BpMLS. These findings indicate that HarvMLS provides reliable estimates of forest structural attributes and their variability during active forest operations.

  • Kafle, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-3480 E-mail: binod.kafle@uef.fi (email)
  • Kankare, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-1579 E-mail: viveka@utu.fi
  • Kaartinen, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-3942 E-mail: harri.kaartinen@nls.fi
  • Väätäinen, Production systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-0432 E-mail: kari.vaatainen@luke.fi
  • Hyyti, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-6221 E-mail: heikki.hyyti@nls.fi
  • Faitli, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-5537 E-mail: tamas.faitli@nls.fi
  • Koivumäki, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-1637 E-mail: niko.koivumaki@maanmittauslaitos.fi
  • Hyyppä, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland E-mail: juha.coelasr@gmail.com
  • Kukko, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), P.O. Box 84, FI-00521 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-6533 E-mail: antero.kukko@nls.fi
  • Kärhä, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: kalle.karha@uef.fi
article id 25013, category Research article
Binod Kafle, Ville Kankare, Harri Kaartinen, Kari Väätäinen, Heikki Hyyti, Tamas Faitli, Juha Hyyppä, Antero Kukko, Kalle Kärhä. (2025). Assessing the consistency of low vegetation characteristics estimated using harvester, handheld, and drone light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems. Silva Fennica vol. 59 no. 2 article id 25013. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.25013
Keywords: biodiversity; harvester; wood harvesting; dense area for games; drone laser scanning (DLS); handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS); point cloud
Highlights: Harvester-mounted LiDAR consistently estimated low vegetation height and volume comparable to handheld and drone LiDAR; Enhancing LiDAR range could improve harvester LiDAR efficiency, reducing processing time and increasing accuracy beyond 20 m.
Abstract | Full text in HTML | Full text in PDF | Author Info

Evaluating the potential of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system in monitoring biodiversity indicators such as low vegetation during forest harvesting could enhance sustainable forest management and habitat conservation including dense forest areas for game. However, there is a lack of understanding on the capabilities and limitations of these systems to detect low vegetation characteristics. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated the performance of a harvester-mounted LiDAR system for measuring low vegetation (height <5 m) attributes in a boreal forest in Finland, by comparing it with handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS) and drone laser scanning (DLS) systems. LiDAR point cloud data was collected in September 2023 to quantify the low vegetation height (maximum, mean, and percentiles), volume (voxel-based and mean height-based) and cover (grid method). Depending on the system, LiDAR point cloud data was collected either before (HMLS and DLS), during (harvester LiDAR) or after (HMLS and DLS) harvesting operations. A total of 46 fixed-sized (5 m × 5 m) grid cells were studied and analyzed. Results showed harvester-mounted LiDAR provided consistent estimates with HMLS and DLS for maximum height, 99th height percentile, and volume across various grids (5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm) and voxel (20 cm) sizes. High correlation was observed between the systems used for these attributes. This study demonstrated that harvester-mounted LiDAR is comparable to HMLS and DLS for assessing low vegetation height and volume. The findings could assist forest harvester operators in identifying potential low vegetation and dense areas for conservation and game management.

  • Kafle, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-3480 E-mail: binod.kafle@uef.fi (email)
  • Kankare, Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-1579 E-mail: viveka@utu.fi
  • Kaartinen, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-3942 E-mail: harri.kaartinen@nls.fi
  • Väätäinen, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Yliopistokatu 6 B, FI-80100 Joensuu, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-0432 E-mail: kari.vaatainen@luke.fi
  • Hyyti, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-6221 E-mail: heikki.hyyti@nls.fi
  • Faitli, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-5537 E-mail: tamas.faitli@nls.fi
  • Hyyppä, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland E-mail: juha.coelasr@gmail.com
  • Kukko, Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI), Opastinsilta 12 C, FI-00520 Helsinki, Finland ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3841-6533 E-mail: antero.kukko@nls.fi
  • Kärhä, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Yliopistokatu 7, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland E-mail: kalle.karha@uef.fi

Register
Click this link to register to Silva Fennica.
Log in
If you are a registered user, log in to save your selected articles for later access.
Contents alert
Sign up to receive alerts of new content
Your selected articles