article id 10414,
category
Research article
Highlights:
Models were developed for predicting stand-level mortality from a large representative NFI data set; The logistic function was used for modelling the probability of no mortality and the proportion of basal area in surviving trees; The models take into account the variation in prediction period length and in plot size; The models showed good fit with respect to stand density, developmental stage and species structure, and showed satisfying fit in the independent data set of unmanaged spruce stands.
Abstract |
Full text in HTML
|
Full text in PDF |
Author Info
New mortality models were developed for the purpose of improving long-term growth and yield simulations in Finland, Norway, and Sweden and were based on permanent national forest inventory plots from Sweden and Norway. Mortality was modelled in two steps. The first model predicts the probability of survival, while the second model predicts the proportion of basal area in surviving trees for plots where mortality has occurred. In both models, the logistic function was used. The models incorporate the variation in prediction period length and in plot size. Validation of both models indicated unbiased mortality rates with respect to various stand characteristics such as stand density, average tree diameter, stand age, and the proportion of different tree species, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), and broadleaves. When testing against an independent dataset of unmanaged spruce-dominated stands in Finland, the models provided unbiased prediction with respect to stand age.
-
Siipilehto,
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, P.O. Box 2, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
E-mail:
jouni.siipilehto@luke.fi
-
Allen,
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Division of Forest and Forest Products, NO-1431 Ås, Norway; Larson and McGowin Inc., Mobile, AL 36607, USA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7824-2849
E-mail:
micky.allen@nibio.no
-
Nilsson,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-4031
E-mail:
urban.nilsson@slu.se
-
Brunner,
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-9714
E-mail:
andreas.brunner@nmbu.no
-
Huuskonen,
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, P.O. Box 2, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-3982
E-mail:
saija.huuskonen@luke.fi
-
Haikarainen,
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, P.O. Box 2, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-3689
E-mail:
soili.haikarainen@luke.fi
-
Subramanian,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-3241
E-mail:
narayanan.subramanian@slu.se
-
Antón-Fernández,
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Division of Forest and Forest Products, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5545-3320
E-mail:
clara.anton.fernandez@nibio.no
-
Holmström,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2025-1942
E-mail:
emma.holmstrom@slu.se
-
Andreassen,
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Division of Forest and Forest Products, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4272-3744
E-mail:
kjellandreassen@gmail.com
-
Hynynen,
Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Natural resources, P.O. Box 2, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
E-mail:
jari.hynynen@luke.fi